From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Dumazet Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] net: Toeplitz library functions Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2013 09:14:59 -0700 Message-ID: <1380039299.3165.91.camel@edumazet-glaptop> References: <1379980991.3165.37.camel@edumazet-glaptop> <20130924023038.GA22393@order.stressinduktion.org> <20130924033505.GB22393@order.stressinduktion.org> <1380001118.3165.41.camel@edumazet-glaptop> <20130924160145.GB26769@order.stressinduktion.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Tom Herbert , davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, jesse.brandeburg@intel.com To: Hannes Frederic Sowa Return-path: Received: from mail-pa0-f48.google.com ([209.85.220.48]:64809 "EHLO mail-pa0-f48.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753844Ab3IXQPC (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Sep 2013 12:15:02 -0400 Received: by mail-pa0-f48.google.com with SMTP id bj1so3861741pad.7 for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2013 09:15:01 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20130924160145.GB26769@order.stressinduktion.org> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, 2013-09-24 at 18:01 +0200, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote: > inet(6)_ehashfn does get used by udp btw. But I do not understand the code, > yet. ;) Oh well, thats the SO_REUSEPORT thing. We do not really care, thats only used to try to steer udp flows on a given socket, but its a hint. Presumably it should use a separate secret key.