netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: jiri@resnulli.us, Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com>,
	Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>,
	Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net>
Subject: [PATCH v5 net-next 11/27] bonding: rework bond_3ad_xmit_xor() to use bond_for_each_slave() only
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2013 09:20:16 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1380093632-1842-12-git-send-email-vfalico@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1380093632-1842-1-git-send-email-vfalico@redhat.com>

Currently, there are two loops - first we find the first slave in an
aggregator after the xmit_hash_policy() returned number, and after that we
loop from that slave, over bonding head, and till that slave to find any
suitable slave to send the packet through.

Replace it by just one bond_for_each_slave() loop, which first loops
through the requested number of slaves, saving the first suitable one, and
after that we've hit the requested number of slaves to skip - search for
any up slave to send the packet through. If we don't find such kind of
slave - then just send the packet through the first suitable slave found.

Logic remains unchainged, and we skip two loops. Also, refactor it a bit
for readability.

CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>
CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net>
Signed-off-by: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com>
---

Notes:
    v4  -> v5
    No change.
    
    v3  -> v4:
    No change.
    
    v2  -> v3:
    No change.
    
    v1  -> v2:
    No changes.
    
    RFC -> v1:
    New patch.

 drivers/net/bonding/bond_3ad.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_3ad.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_3ad.c
index 3847aee..c861ee7 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_3ad.c
+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_3ad.c
@@ -2417,15 +2417,15 @@ int bond_3ad_get_active_agg_info(struct bonding *bond, struct ad_info *ad_info)
 
 int bond_3ad_xmit_xor(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
 {
-	struct slave *slave, *start_at;
 	struct bonding *bond = netdev_priv(dev);
+	struct slave *slave, *first_ok_slave;
+	struct aggregator *agg;
+	struct ad_info ad_info;
 	struct list_head *iter;
-	int slave_agg_no;
 	int slaves_in_agg;
-	int agg_id;
-	int i;
-	struct ad_info ad_info;
+	int slave_agg_no;
 	int res = 1;
+	int agg_id;
 
 	read_lock(&bond->lock);
 	if (__bond_3ad_get_active_agg_info(bond, &ad_info)) {
@@ -2438,20 +2438,28 @@ int bond_3ad_xmit_xor(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
 	agg_id = ad_info.aggregator_id;
 
 	if (slaves_in_agg == 0) {
-		/*the aggregator is empty*/
 		pr_debug("%s: Error: active aggregator is empty\n", dev->name);
 		goto out;
 	}
 
 	slave_agg_no = bond->xmit_hash_policy(skb, slaves_in_agg);
+	first_ok_slave = NULL;
 
 	bond_for_each_slave(bond, slave, iter) {
-		struct aggregator *agg = SLAVE_AD_INFO(slave).port.aggregator;
+		agg = SLAVE_AD_INFO(slave).port.aggregator;
+		if (!agg || agg->aggregator_identifier != agg_id)
+			continue;
 
-		if (agg && (agg->aggregator_identifier == agg_id)) {
+		if (slave_agg_no >= 0) {
+			if (!first_ok_slave && SLAVE_IS_OK(slave))
+				first_ok_slave = slave;
 			slave_agg_no--;
-			if (slave_agg_no < 0)
-				break;
+			continue;
+		}
+
+		if (SLAVE_IS_OK(slave)) {
+			res = bond_dev_queue_xmit(bond, skb, slave->dev);
+			goto out;
 		}
 	}
 
@@ -2461,20 +2469,10 @@ int bond_3ad_xmit_xor(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
 		goto out;
 	}
 
-	start_at = slave;
-
-	bond_for_each_slave_from(bond, slave, i, start_at) {
-		int slave_agg_id = 0;
-		struct aggregator *agg = SLAVE_AD_INFO(slave).port.aggregator;
-
-		if (agg)
-			slave_agg_id = agg->aggregator_identifier;
-
-		if (SLAVE_IS_OK(slave) && agg && (slave_agg_id == agg_id)) {
-			res = bond_dev_queue_xmit(bond, skb, slave->dev);
-			break;
-		}
-	}
+	/* we couldn't find any suitable slave after the agg_no, so use the
+	 * first suitable found, if found. */
+	if (first_ok_slave)
+		res = bond_dev_queue_xmit(bond, skb, first_ok_slave->dev);
 
 out:
 	read_unlock(&bond->lock);
-- 
1.8.4

  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-09-25  7:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-09-25  7:20 [PATCH v5 net-next 00/27] bonding: use neighbours instead of own lists Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-25  7:20 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 01/27] net: use lists as arguments instead of bool upper Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-25  7:20 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 02/27] net: add adj_list to save only neighbours Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-25  7:20 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 03/27] net: add RCU variant to search for netdev_adjacent link Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-25  7:20 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 04/27] net: add netdev_adjacent->private and allow to use it Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-25  7:20 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 05/27] bonding: populate neighbour's private on enslave Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-25  7:20 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 06/27] bonding: modify bond_get_slave_by_dev() to use neighbours Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-25  7:20 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 07/27] net: add for_each iterators through neighbour lower link's private Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-25  7:20 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 08/27] bonding: remove bond_for_each_slave_continue_reverse() Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-25  7:20 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 09/27] bonding: make bond_for_each_slave() use lower neighbour's private Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-25  7:20 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 10/27] bonding: use bond_for_each_slave() in bond_uninit() Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-25  7:20 ` Veaceslav Falico [this message]
2013-09-26  2:31   ` [PATCH v5 net-next 11/27] bonding: rework bond_3ad_xmit_xor() to use bond_for_each_slave() only Ding Tianhong
2013-09-26  5:43     ` Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-26  6:39       ` Ding Tianhong
2013-09-25  7:20 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 12/27] bonding: rework rlb_next_rx_slave() to use bond_for_each_slave() Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-25  7:20 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 13/27] bonding: rework bond_find_best_slave() " Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-25  7:20 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 14/27] bonding: rework bond_ab_arp_probe() " Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-25  7:20 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 15/27] bonding: remove unused bond_for_each_slave_from() Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-25  7:20 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 16/27] bonding: add bond_has_slaves() and use it Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-25  7:20 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 17/27] bonding: convert bond_has_slaves() to use the neighbour list Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-25  7:20 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 18/27] net: add a possibility to get private from netdev_adjacent->list Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-25  7:20 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 19/27] bonding: convert first/last slave logic to use neighbours Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-25  7:20 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 20/27] bonding: remove bond_prev_slave() Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-25  7:20 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 21/27] bonding: add __bond_next_slave() which uses neighbours Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-25  7:20 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 22/27] bonding: use neighbours for bond_next_slave() Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-25  7:20 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 23/27] bonding: remove slave lists Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-25  7:20 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 24/27] vlan: link the upper neighbour only after registering Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-25  7:20 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 25/27] vlan: unlink the upper neighbour before unregistering Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-25  7:20 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 26/27] net: expose the master link to sysfs, and remove it from bond Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-25  7:20 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 27/27] net: create sysfs symlinks for neighbour devices Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-26 20:02 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 00/27] bonding: use neighbours instead of own lists David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1380093632-1842-12-git-send-email-vfalico@redhat.com \
    --to=vfalico@redhat.com \
    --cc=andy@greyhouse.net \
    --cc=fubar@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).