From: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: jiri@resnulli.us, Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com>,
Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>,
Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net>
Subject: [PATCH v5 net-next 14/27] bonding: rework bond_ab_arp_probe() to use bond_for_each_slave()
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2013 09:20:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1380093632-1842-15-git-send-email-vfalico@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1380093632-1842-1-git-send-email-vfalico@redhat.com>
Currently it uses the hard-to-rcuify bond_for_each_slave_from(), and also
it doesn't check every slave for disrepencies between the actual
IS_UP(slave) and the slave->link == BOND_LINK_UP, but only till we find the
next suitable slave.
Fix this by using bond_for_each_slave() and storing the first good slave in
*before till we find the current_arp_slave, after that we store the first good
slave in new_slave. If new_slave is empty - use the slave stored in before,
and if it's also empty - then we didn't find any suitable slave.
Also, in the meanwhile, check for each slave status.
CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>
CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net>
Signed-off-by: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com>
---
Notes:
v4 -> v5
No change.
v3 -> v4:
No change.
v2 -> v3:
No change.
v1 -> v2:
No changes.
RFC -> v1:
New patch.
drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
index 6abbfac..3c96b1b 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
@@ -2761,8 +2761,9 @@ do_failover:
*/
static void bond_ab_arp_probe(struct bonding *bond)
{
- struct slave *slave, *next_slave;
- int i;
+ struct slave *slave, *before = NULL, *new_slave = NULL;
+ struct list_head *iter;
+ bool found = false;
read_lock(&bond->curr_slave_lock);
@@ -2792,18 +2793,12 @@ static void bond_ab_arp_probe(struct bonding *bond)
bond_set_slave_inactive_flags(bond->current_arp_slave);
- /* search for next candidate */
- next_slave = bond_next_slave(bond, bond->current_arp_slave);
- bond_for_each_slave_from(bond, slave, i, next_slave) {
- if (IS_UP(slave->dev)) {
- slave->link = BOND_LINK_BACK;
- bond_set_slave_active_flags(slave);
- bond_arp_send_all(bond, slave);
- slave->jiffies = jiffies;
- bond->current_arp_slave = slave;
- break;
- }
+ bond_for_each_slave(bond, slave, iter) {
+ if (!found && !before && IS_UP(slave->dev))
+ before = slave;
+ if (found && !new_slave && IS_UP(slave->dev))
+ new_slave = slave;
/* if the link state is up at this point, we
* mark it down - this can happen if we have
* simultaneous link failures and
@@ -2811,7 +2806,7 @@ static void bond_ab_arp_probe(struct bonding *bond)
* one the current slave so it is still marked
* up when it is actually down
*/
- if (slave->link == BOND_LINK_UP) {
+ if (!IS_UP(slave->dev) && slave->link == BOND_LINK_UP) {
slave->link = BOND_LINK_DOWN;
if (slave->link_failure_count < UINT_MAX)
slave->link_failure_count++;
@@ -2821,7 +2816,22 @@ static void bond_ab_arp_probe(struct bonding *bond)
pr_info("%s: backup interface %s is now down.\n",
bond->dev->name, slave->dev->name);
}
+ if (slave == bond->current_arp_slave)
+ found = true;
}
+
+ if (!new_slave && before)
+ new_slave = before;
+
+ if (!new_slave)
+ return;
+
+ new_slave->link = BOND_LINK_BACK;
+ bond_set_slave_active_flags(new_slave);
+ bond_arp_send_all(bond, new_slave);
+ new_slave->jiffies = jiffies;
+ bond->current_arp_slave = new_slave;
+
}
void bond_activebackup_arp_mon(struct work_struct *work)
--
1.8.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-25 7:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-25 7:20 [PATCH v5 net-next 00/27] bonding: use neighbours instead of own lists Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-25 7:20 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 01/27] net: use lists as arguments instead of bool upper Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-25 7:20 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 02/27] net: add adj_list to save only neighbours Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-25 7:20 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 03/27] net: add RCU variant to search for netdev_adjacent link Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-25 7:20 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 04/27] net: add netdev_adjacent->private and allow to use it Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-25 7:20 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 05/27] bonding: populate neighbour's private on enslave Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-25 7:20 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 06/27] bonding: modify bond_get_slave_by_dev() to use neighbours Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-25 7:20 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 07/27] net: add for_each iterators through neighbour lower link's private Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-25 7:20 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 08/27] bonding: remove bond_for_each_slave_continue_reverse() Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-25 7:20 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 09/27] bonding: make bond_for_each_slave() use lower neighbour's private Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-25 7:20 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 10/27] bonding: use bond_for_each_slave() in bond_uninit() Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-25 7:20 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 11/27] bonding: rework bond_3ad_xmit_xor() to use bond_for_each_slave() only Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-26 2:31 ` Ding Tianhong
2013-09-26 5:43 ` Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-26 6:39 ` Ding Tianhong
2013-09-25 7:20 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 12/27] bonding: rework rlb_next_rx_slave() to use bond_for_each_slave() Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-25 7:20 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 13/27] bonding: rework bond_find_best_slave() " Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-25 7:20 ` Veaceslav Falico [this message]
2013-09-25 7:20 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 15/27] bonding: remove unused bond_for_each_slave_from() Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-25 7:20 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 16/27] bonding: add bond_has_slaves() and use it Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-25 7:20 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 17/27] bonding: convert bond_has_slaves() to use the neighbour list Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-25 7:20 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 18/27] net: add a possibility to get private from netdev_adjacent->list Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-25 7:20 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 19/27] bonding: convert first/last slave logic to use neighbours Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-25 7:20 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 20/27] bonding: remove bond_prev_slave() Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-25 7:20 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 21/27] bonding: add __bond_next_slave() which uses neighbours Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-25 7:20 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 22/27] bonding: use neighbours for bond_next_slave() Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-25 7:20 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 23/27] bonding: remove slave lists Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-25 7:20 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 24/27] vlan: link the upper neighbour only after registering Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-25 7:20 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 25/27] vlan: unlink the upper neighbour before unregistering Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-25 7:20 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 26/27] net: expose the master link to sysfs, and remove it from bond Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-25 7:20 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 27/27] net: create sysfs symlinks for neighbour devices Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-26 20:02 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 00/27] bonding: use neighbours instead of own lists David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1380093632-1842-15-git-send-email-vfalico@redhat.com \
--to=vfalico@redhat.com \
--cc=andy@greyhouse.net \
--cc=fubar@us.ibm.com \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).