public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, fw@strlen.de, edumazet@google.com,
	davem@davemloft.net, ycheng@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] net: introduce support for lazy initialization of secret keys
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2013 15:42:26 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1380148946.3165.166.camel@edumazet-glaptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130925213403.GF4904@order.stressinduktion.org>

On Wed, 2013-09-25 at 23:34 +0200, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
> net_get_random_once is a new macro which handles the initialization of
> secret keys at use-site. It is possible to call it in the fast path. Only
> the initialization depends on the spinlock and is rather slow. Otherwise
> it should get used just before the key is used to delay the entropy
> extration as late as possible to get better randomness. It returns true
> if the key got initialized.

So you don't like cmpxchg() ;)

> +/* BE CAREFUL: this function is not interrupt safe */
> +#define net_get_random_once(buf, nbytes)				\
> +	({								\
> +		static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(__lock);				\
> +		static bool __done = false;				\
> +		bool __ret = false;					\
> +		if (unlikely(!__done))					\
> +			__ret = __net_get_random_once(buf,		\
> +						    nbytes,		\
> +						    &__done,		\
> +						    &__lock);		\
> +		__ret;							\
> +	})
> +
>  

No idea why its needed to have one spinlock per call point.

A single lock should be more than enough.

The spinlock could be private to __net_get_random_once()

+bool __net_get_random_once(void *buf, int nbytes, bool *done,
+                           spinlock_t *lock)
+{
+       spin_lock_bh(lock);
+       if (*done) {
+               spin_unlock_bh(lock);
+               return false;
+       }
+
+       get_random_bytes(buf, nbytes);

I think you might need a memory barrier here.

(smp_wmb();)

+       *done = true;
+       spin_unlock_bh(lock);


BTW, build_ehash_secret() is called like that :

if (unlikely(!inet_ehash_secret))
    if (sock->type != SOCK_RAW && sock->type != SOCK_DGRAM)
        build_ehash_secret();

So it would be better to make sure inet_ehash_secret is not 0 by
accident.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-09-25 22:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-09-25 21:34 [PATCH RFC] net: introduce support for lazy initialization of secret keys Hannes Frederic Sowa
2013-09-25 22:14 ` Florian Westphal
2013-09-25 22:42 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2013-09-25 22:58   ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2013-09-26  2:50   ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2013-09-26  3:03     ` Hannes Frederic Sowa

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1380148946.3165.166.camel@edumazet-glaptop \
    --to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=fw@strlen.de \
    --cc=hannes@stressinduktion.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ycheng@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox