From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ian Campbell Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] xen-netfront: convert to GRO API and advertise this feature Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 10:12:11 +0100 Message-ID: <1380532331.1302.9.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com> References: <1379779543-27122-1-git-send-email-wei.liu2@citrix.com> <20130928.153800.327243541797748645.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: , , , To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from smtp02.citrix.com ([66.165.176.63]:17743 "EHLO SMTP02.CITRIX.COM" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752775Ab3I3JMP (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Sep 2013 05:12:15 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20130928.153800.327243541797748645.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sat, 2013-09-28 at 15:38 -0400, David Miller wrote: > From: Wei Liu > Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2013 17:05:43 +0100 > > > @@ -1371,7 +1373,8 @@ static struct net_device *xennet_create_dev(struct xenbus_device *dev) > > netif_napi_add(netdev, &np->napi, xennet_poll, 64); > > netdev->features = NETIF_F_IP_CSUM | NETIF_F_RXCSUM | > > NETIF_F_GSO_ROBUST; > > - netdev->hw_features = NETIF_F_IP_CSUM | NETIF_F_SG | NETIF_F_TSO; > > + netdev->hw_features = NETIF_F_IP_CSUM | NETIF_F_SG | NETIF_F_TSO | > > + NETIF_F_GRO; > > Please post a new version of this patch with the feedback you've been > given integrated, in particular with this part removed because it is > not necessary. > > Ian, please review the patch when Wei posts it. I will, but note: $ ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl -f drivers/net/xen-netfront.c Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk (supporter:XEN HYPERVISOR IN...) Jeremy Fitzhardinge (supporter:XEN HYPERVISOR IN...) xen-devel@lists.xensource.com (moderated list:XEN HYPERVISOR IN...) virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org (open list:XEN HYPERVISOR IN...) netdev@vger.kernel.org (open list:NETWORKING DRIVERS) linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (open list) Strictly speaking I maintain netback not front, so Wei please remember to CC the right people (mainly Konrad) as well as me. BTW I think this separation is a good thing since it keeps changes to the protocol "honest". Doesn't matter so much for this particular patch since don't think it actually touches the protocol. Ian.