From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] ath10k: wmi: Convert use of 6 to ETH_ALEN
Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2013 23:07:17 -0700
Message-ID: <1380780437.2081.106.camel@joe-AO722>
References: <1380679480.2081.24.camel@joe-AO722>
	 <87k3hw469z.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com>
	 <1380696054.2081.35.camel@joe-AO722>
	 <CAB=NE6V3b4+B06hzPjhww52wp1FHho3329cP25=5Cy833bysvg@mail.gmail.com>
	 <1380736969.2081.72.camel@joe-AO722>
	 <alpine.DEB.2.02.1310030034030.2162@localhost6.localdomain6>
	 <1380758954.2081.79.camel@joe-AO722> <1380760114.2081.81.camel@joe-AO722>
	 <1380771110.2081.89.camel@joe-AO722> <1380771551.2081.93.camel@joe-AO722>
	 <1380773924.19002.131.camel@edumazet-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com>
	 <87fvsjynuk.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com>
	 <1380775478.19002.139.camel@edumazet-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com>
	 <1380776994.2081.101.camel@joe-AO722>
	 <1380777884.19002.155.camel@edumazet-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com>
	 <1380778451.2081.103.camel@joe-AO722>
	 <1380780021.19002.164.camel@edumazet-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Kalle Valo <kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com>,
	Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>,
	"Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@do-not-panic.com>,
	netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, ath10k@lists.infradead.org,
	"John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from smtprelay0024.hostedemail.com ([216.40.44.24]:44079 "EHLO
	smtprelay.hostedemail.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL)
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752845Ab3JCGHV (ORCPT
	<rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>); Thu, 3 Oct 2013 02:07:21 -0400
In-Reply-To: <1380780021.19002.164.camel@edumazet-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>

On Wed, 2013-10-02 at 23:00 -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-10-02 at 22:34 -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/10/1/517
> I had no problem with this one.
> Did I say something (funny or not) about it ?

Nope, you didn't say anything publicly or
even privately to me.

> Apparently you mix things and you do not like me commenting or giving a
> feedback on a _particular_ patch.

Feedback like expecting 500 individual patches
when you apparently saw one that modified 57 files
with multiple maintainers _is_ pretty funny.

cheers, Joe