* [PATCH net-next] netem: markov loss model transition fix
@ 2013-10-22 21:27 Hagen Paul Pfeifer
2013-10-25 23:04 ` David Miller
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Hagen Paul Pfeifer @ 2013-10-22 21:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netdev
Cc: Hagen Paul Pfeifer, Stephen Hemminger, Eric Dumazet,
Stefano Salsano, Fabio Ludovici
The transition from markov state "3 => lost packets within a burst
period" to "1 => successfully transmitted packets within a gap period"
has no *additional* loss event. The loss already happen for transition
from 1 -> 3, this additional loss will make things go wild.
E.g. transition probabilities:
p13: 10%
p31: 100%
Expected:
Ploss = p13 / (p13 + p31)
Ploss = ~9.09%
... but it isn't. Even worse: we get a double loss - each time.
So simple don't return true to indicate loss, rather break and return
false.
Signed-off-by: Hagen Paul Pfeifer <hagen@jauu.net>
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: Stefano Salsano <stefano.salsano@uniroma2.it>
Cc: Fabio Ludovici <fabio.ludovici@yahoo.it>
Signed-off-by: Hagen Paul Pfeifer <hagen@jauu.net>
---
net/sched/sch_netem.c | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/sched/sch_netem.c b/net/sched/sch_netem.c
index a6d788d..6bf9088 100644
--- a/net/sched/sch_netem.c
+++ b/net/sched/sch_netem.c
@@ -235,7 +235,6 @@ static bool loss_4state(struct netem_sched_data *q)
clg->state = 2;
else if (clg->a3 < rnd && rnd < clg->a2 + clg->a3) {
clg->state = 1;
- return true;
} else if (clg->a2 + clg->a3 < rnd) {
clg->state = 3;
return true;
--
1.8.4.rc3
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH net-next] netem: markov loss model transition fix
2013-10-22 21:27 [PATCH net-next] netem: markov loss model transition fix Hagen Paul Pfeifer
@ 2013-10-25 23:04 ` David Miller
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: David Miller @ 2013-10-25 23:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: hagen; +Cc: netdev, stephen, edumazet, stefano.salsano, fabio.ludovici
From: Hagen Paul Pfeifer <hagen@jauu.net>
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 23:27:06 +0200
> The transition from markov state "3 => lost packets within a burst
> period" to "1 => successfully transmitted packets within a gap period"
> has no *additional* loss event. The loss already happen for transition
> from 1 -> 3, this additional loss will make things go wild.
>
> E.g. transition probabilities:
>
> p13: 10%
> p31: 100%
>
> Expected:
>
> Ploss = p13 / (p13 + p31)
> Ploss = ~9.09%
>
> ... but it isn't. Even worse: we get a double loss - each time.
> So simple don't return true to indicate loss, rather break and return
> false.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hagen Paul Pfeifer <hagen@jauu.net>
> Cc: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
> Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
> Cc: Stefano Salsano <stefano.salsano@uniroma2.it>
> Cc: Fabio Ludovici <fabio.ludovici@yahoo.it>
> Signed-off-by: Hagen Paul Pfeifer <hagen@jauu.net>
Applied.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-10-25 23:04 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-10-22 21:27 [PATCH net-next] netem: markov loss model transition fix Hagen Paul Pfeifer
2013-10-25 23:04 ` David Miller
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).