From: Antonio Quartulli <antonio@meshcoding.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, David.Laight@ACULAB.COM,
Antonio Quartulli <antonio@meshcoding.com>
Subject: [PATCHv2 net] netpoll: fix rx_hook() interface by passing the skb
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 23:36:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1382564190-334-1-git-send-email-antonio@meshcoding.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131023.161603.1190144528425577653.davem@davemloft.net>
Right now skb->data is passed to rx_hook() even if the skb
has not been linearised and without giving rx_hook() a way
to linearise it.
Change the rx_hook() interface and make it accept the skb
and the offset to the UDP payload as arguments. rx_hook() is
also renamed to rx_skb_hook() to ensure that out of the tree
users notice the API change.
In this way any rx_skb_hook() implementation can perform all
the needed operations to properly (and safely) access the
skb data.
Signed-off-by: Antonio Quartulli <antonio@meshcoding.com>
---
include/linux/netpoll.h | 5 +++--
net/core/netpoll.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++-------------
2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/netpoll.h b/include/linux/netpoll.h
index f3c7c24..fbfdb9d 100644
--- a/include/linux/netpoll.h
+++ b/include/linux/netpoll.h
@@ -24,7 +24,8 @@ struct netpoll {
struct net_device *dev;
char dev_name[IFNAMSIZ];
const char *name;
- void (*rx_hook)(struct netpoll *, int, char *, int);
+ void (*rx_skb_hook)(struct netpoll *np, int source, struct sk_buff *skb,
+ int offset, int len);
union inet_addr local_ip, remote_ip;
bool ipv6;
@@ -41,7 +42,7 @@ struct netpoll_info {
unsigned long rx_flags;
spinlock_t rx_lock;
struct semaphore dev_lock;
- struct list_head rx_np; /* netpolls that registered an rx_hook */
+ struct list_head rx_np; /* netpolls that registered an rx_skb_hook */
struct sk_buff_head neigh_tx; /* list of neigh requests to reply to */
struct sk_buff_head txq;
diff --git a/net/core/netpoll.c b/net/core/netpoll.c
index fc75c9e..8f97199 100644
--- a/net/core/netpoll.c
+++ b/net/core/netpoll.c
@@ -636,8 +636,9 @@ static void netpoll_neigh_reply(struct sk_buff *skb, struct netpoll_info *npinfo
netpoll_send_skb(np, send_skb);
- /* If there are several rx_hooks for the same address,
- we're fine by sending a single reply */
+ /* If there are several rx_skb_hooks for the same
+ * address we're fine by sending a single reply
+ */
break;
}
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&npinfo->rx_lock, flags);
@@ -719,8 +720,9 @@ static void netpoll_neigh_reply(struct sk_buff *skb, struct netpoll_info *npinfo
netpoll_send_skb(np, send_skb);
- /* If there are several rx_hooks for the same address,
- we're fine by sending a single reply */
+ /* If there are several rx_skb_hooks for the same
+ * address, we're fine by sending a single reply
+ */
break;
}
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&npinfo->rx_lock, flags);
@@ -756,11 +758,12 @@ static bool pkt_is_ns(struct sk_buff *skb)
int __netpoll_rx(struct sk_buff *skb, struct netpoll_info *npinfo)
{
- int proto, len, ulen;
- int hits = 0;
+ int proto, len, ulen, data_len;
+ int hits = 0, offset;
const struct iphdr *iph;
struct udphdr *uh;
struct netpoll *np, *tmp;
+ uint16_t source;
if (list_empty(&npinfo->rx_np))
goto out;
@@ -820,7 +823,10 @@ int __netpoll_rx(struct sk_buff *skb, struct netpoll_info *npinfo)
len -= iph->ihl*4;
uh = (struct udphdr *)(((char *)iph) + iph->ihl*4);
+ offset = (unsigned char *)(uh + 1) - skb->data;
ulen = ntohs(uh->len);
+ data_len = skb->len - offset;
+ source = ntohs(uh->source);
if (ulen != len)
goto out;
@@ -834,9 +840,7 @@ int __netpoll_rx(struct sk_buff *skb, struct netpoll_info *npinfo)
if (np->local_port && np->local_port != ntohs(uh->dest))
continue;
- np->rx_hook(np, ntohs(uh->source),
- (char *)(uh+1),
- ulen - sizeof(struct udphdr));
+ np->rx_skb_hook(np, source, skb, offset, data_len);
hits++;
}
} else {
@@ -859,7 +863,10 @@ int __netpoll_rx(struct sk_buff *skb, struct netpoll_info *npinfo)
if (!pskb_may_pull(skb, sizeof(struct udphdr)))
goto out;
uh = udp_hdr(skb);
+ offset = (unsigned char *)(uh + 1) - skb->data;
ulen = ntohs(uh->len);
+ data_len = skb->len - offset;
+ source = ntohs(uh->source);
if (ulen != skb->len)
goto out;
if (udp6_csum_init(skb, uh, IPPROTO_UDP))
@@ -872,9 +879,7 @@ int __netpoll_rx(struct sk_buff *skb, struct netpoll_info *npinfo)
if (np->local_port && np->local_port != ntohs(uh->dest))
continue;
- np->rx_hook(np, ntohs(uh->source),
- (char *)(uh+1),
- ulen - sizeof(struct udphdr));
+ np->rx_skb_hook(np, source, skb, offset, data_len);
hits++;
}
#endif
@@ -1062,7 +1067,7 @@ int __netpoll_setup(struct netpoll *np, struct net_device *ndev, gfp_t gfp)
npinfo->netpoll = np;
- if (np->rx_hook) {
+ if (np->rx_skb_hook) {
spin_lock_irqsave(&npinfo->rx_lock, flags);
npinfo->rx_flags |= NETPOLL_RX_ENABLED;
list_add_tail(&np->rx, &npinfo->rx_np);
--
1.8.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-23 21:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-21 21:31 [PATCH net] netpoll: linearize skb before accessing its data Antonio Quartulli
2013-10-21 22:23 ` David Miller
2013-10-22 6:06 ` Antonio Quartulli
2013-10-22 6:25 ` David Miller
2013-10-22 6:37 ` Antonio Quartulli
2013-10-22 6:50 ` David Miller
2013-10-22 8:48 ` [PATCH net] netpoll: fix rx_hook() interface by passing the skb Antonio Quartulli
2013-10-22 9:09 ` David Laight
2013-10-22 10:11 ` Antonio Quartulli
2013-10-22 12:46 ` David Laight
2013-10-22 17:13 ` Antonio Quartulli
2013-10-22 19:40 ` David Miller
2013-10-23 8:33 ` David Laight
2013-10-23 10:28 ` Antonio Quartulli
2013-10-23 11:18 ` David Laight
2013-10-23 12:44 ` Antonio Quartulli
2013-10-23 20:16 ` David Miller
2013-10-23 21:36 ` Antonio Quartulli [this message]
2013-10-24 8:43 ` [PATCHv2 " David Laight
2013-10-24 12:01 ` Antonio Quartulli
2013-10-24 17:53 ` David Miller
2013-10-25 23:27 ` David Miller
2013-10-21 22:25 ` [PATCH net] netpoll: linearize skb before accessing its data Eric Dumazet
2013-10-21 22:33 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1382564190-334-1-git-send-email-antonio@meshcoding.com \
--to=antonio@meshcoding.com \
--cc=David.Laight@ACULAB.COM \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).