From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Berg Subject: Re: [PATCHv2] net: wireless: iwlwifi: remove minor dead code Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 14:42:38 +0100 Message-ID: <1384177358.14334.13.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> References: <1384110397-24386-1-git-send-email-mpn@google.com> <527FDB50.1050902@cogentembedded.com> <87iow080zv.fsf@mina86.com> (sfid-20131110_211839_411605_2F9FC912) <1384177312.14334.12.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> (sfid-20131111_144211_754203_F365C56C) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Sergei Shtylyov , Emmanuel Grumbach , "John W. Linville" , Intel Linux Wireless , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: Michal Nazarewicz Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1384177312.14334.12.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> (sfid-20131111_144211_754203_F365C56C) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2013-11-11 at 14:41 +0100, Johannes Berg wrote: > > @@ -1150,7 +1149,14 @@ static irqreturn_t iwl_pcie_isr(int irq, void *data) > > * or due to sporadic interrupts thrown from our NIC. */ > > if (!inta) { > > IWL_DEBUG_ISR(trans, "Ignore interrupt, inta == 0\n"); > > - goto none; > > + /* re-enable interrupts here since we don't have anything to > > + * service. only Re-enable if disabled by irq and no > > + * schedules tasklet. > > + */ > > + if (test_bit(STATUS_INT_ENABLED, &trans_pcie->status) && > > + !trans_pcie->inta) > > + iwl_enable_interrupts(trans); > > + return IRQ_NONE; > > I don't really think duplicating this is really an improvement? Err, sorry, not paying attention. johannes