From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Dumazet Subject: Re: TCP performance regression Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 08:44:36 -0800 Message-ID: <1384188276.16391.45.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com> References: <21120.27501.32323.332316@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <1384149326.16391.10.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com> <21120.29720.673157.151074@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <1384152853.16391.19.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com> <21120.37647.979237.40802@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <1384180069.16391.32.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com> <1384180787.16391.35.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Arnaud Ebalard , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Dave Taht , Thomas Petazzoni To: Sujith Manoharan Return-path: Received: from mail-pa0-f48.google.com ([209.85.220.48]:34560 "EHLO mail-pa0-f48.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753890Ab3KKQok (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Nov 2013 11:44:40 -0500 Received: by mail-pa0-f48.google.com with SMTP id kq14so5588151pab.35 for ; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 08:44:39 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1384180787.16391.35.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, 2013-11-11 at 06:39 -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote: > How following patch helps mvneta performance on current net-next tree > for a single TCP (sending) flow ? > v2 (more chance to even compile ;) diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c index 7d99e695a110..e8211277f15d 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c @@ -172,12 +172,12 @@ /* Various constants */ /* Coalescing */ -#define MVNETA_TXDONE_COAL_PKTS 16 +#define MVNETA_TXDONE_COAL_PKTS 1 #define MVNETA_RX_COAL_PKTS 32 #define MVNETA_RX_COAL_USEC 100 /* Timer */ -#define MVNETA_TX_DONE_TIMER_PERIOD 10 +#define MVNETA_TX_DONE_TIMER_PERIOD 1 /* Napi polling weight */ #define MVNETA_RX_POLL_WEIGHT 64