Re: [net-next 01/14] i40e: separate TSYNVALID and TSYNINDX fields in Rx descriptor

[Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1132 bytes --]

On Sat, 2013-12-07 at 23:33 +0200, Or Gerlitz wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 4:17 AM, Jeff Kirsher
> <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com> wrote:
> > From: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>
> >
> > In order to get 1588 to work correctly the defines need a bit
> > of a tweak.
> >
> > Change-Id: Ie50ce2a18e1593441f1560411e5a4f51c6d48aaa
> 
> Hi Jeff, we also use this token with out internal gerrit system but
> make sure to strip that before sending upstream, are we OK for
> upstream commit to carry such tokens from the vendors systems?
> 

I asked that question to Dave last week and to summarize the email
thread, "if there were commit's in Linus's tree with the Change-Id
information, then we could do something similar".  We originally were
using "Internal ID:" but since there was some documented use of
"Change-Id:", we adopted the use.

> 
> 
> > Signed-off-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>
> > Tested-by: Kavindya Deegala <kavindya.s.deegala@intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>



[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]