netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Maxime Bizon <mbizon@freebox.fr>
To: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] xfrm: Increase the garbage collector threshold
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2013 17:13:29 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1386951209.25449.61.camel@sakura.staff.proxad.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131213101203.GO31491@secunet.com>


On Fri, 2013-12-13 at 11:12 +0100, Steffen Klassert wrote:

> Can you please be a bit more precise with your problem description?

yes sorry I wasn't clear.

I have a problem with an even simpler workload that the one using apache
bench in the original bug report.

I am using ipsec transport mode between two hosts and just run this on
one side:

  while :; do wget -O /dev/null http://remote_host/; done

I was surprised to see it fails after only 1024 requests (ENOBUF on
connect), and how long I had to wait to be able to do new requests.

After debugging I saw that the xfrm gc was called but was not able to
release anything.

after running "ip route flush cache", which forces all ipv4 dst entries
to be released, suddenly the xfrm gc had something to free, and xfrm
entry count went to zero.

So if it is correct that once a ipv4 dst entry exists, the xfrm entry
cannot be gc-ed, then we need to make sure we allow more xfrm entries to
be allocated than ipv4 dst.

> This patch changes only the number of cache entries before
> we start garbage collecting. It does not change anything
> on the garbage collector itself.

Yes my point was that it just hides another underlying problem.

-- 
Maxime

  reply	other threads:[~2013-12-13 16:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-11-01  8:21 pull request (net): ipsec 2013-11-01 Steffen Klassert
2013-11-01  8:21 ` [PATCH 1/3] xfrm: prevent ipcomp scratch buffer race condition Steffen Klassert
2013-11-01  8:21 ` [PATCH 2/3] xfrm: Increase the garbage collector threshold Steffen Klassert
2013-12-10 14:38   ` Maxime Bizon
2013-12-13 10:12     ` Steffen Klassert
2013-12-13 16:13       ` Maxime Bizon [this message]
2013-12-16 11:51         ` Steffen Klassert
2013-12-16 14:29           ` Maxime Bizon
2013-11-01  8:21 ` [PATCH 3/3] xfrm: Fix null pointer dereference when decoding sessions Steffen Klassert
2013-11-24 14:27   ` Matthias Schiffer
2013-12-01  4:19     ` Matthias Schiffer
2013-12-02  1:35       ` David Miller
2013-12-03  9:56         ` Steffen Klassert
2013-12-03 10:37           ` Wolfgang Walter
2013-12-03 10:41             ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2013-12-05 21:35           ` David Miller
2013-11-02  5:22 ` pull request (net): ipsec 2013-11-01 David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1386951209.25449.61.camel@sakura.staff.proxad.net \
    --to=mbizon@freebox.fr \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=steffen.klassert@secunet.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).