From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Toshiaki Makita Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2 5/9] bridge: Fix the way to check if a local fdb entry can be deleted Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2013 17:02:56 +0900 Message-ID: <1387526576.3475.5.camel@ubuntu-vm-makita> References: <1387281821-21342-1-git-send-email-makita.toshiaki@lab.ntt.co.jp> <1387281821-21342-6-git-send-email-makita.toshiaki@lab.ntt.co.jp> <52B09DB2.7040700@redhat.com> <1387341972.3563.71.camel@ubuntu-vm-makita> <52B1D9E6.7020201@redhat.com> <1387455834.4084.47.camel@ubuntu-vm-makita> <20131219093921.449c5d62@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: vyasevic@redhat.com, "David S . Miller" , netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Stephen Hemminger Return-path: Received: from tama50.ecl.ntt.co.jp ([129.60.39.147]:57542 "EHLO tama50.ecl.ntt.co.jp" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751383Ab3LTIDH (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Dec 2013 03:03:07 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20131219093921.449c5d62@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, 2013-12-19 at 09:39 -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote: ... > Could we make up as set of test case scripts to validate these changes. > Now that FDB table can be manipulated by iproute tools, should be possible > to have set of cases for validation. Thank you for your suggestion. Maybe is it enough to make some test of port attach/detach and confirm that data/control plane doesn't result in any inconsistency or odd situation by tcpdump/bridge commands? Thanks, Toshiaki Makita