From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ben Hutchings Subject: Re: inconsistency of ethtool feature names for get vs. set Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2014 20:39:04 +0000 Message-ID: <1389040744.9947.105.camel@bwh-desktop.uk.level5networks.com> References: <52C535B9.7080208@mellanox.com> <1388675034.1607.9.camel@bwh-desktop.uk.level5networks.com> <1388688114.9947.30.camel@bwh-desktop.uk.level5networks.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Or Gerlitz , netdev To: Or Gerlitz Return-path: Received: from webmail.solarflare.com ([12.187.104.25]:36212 "EHLO webmail.solarflare.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754221AbaAFUjI (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Jan 2014 15:39:08 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, 2014-01-02 at 22:12 +0200, Or Gerlitz wrote: > On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 8:41 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > > Just to be clear, I do see that there's a problem here but the fix may > > have to be mostly or entirely in documentation rather than code. > > Ben, I am fine with at least starting with documenting this and see > where it takes us, can you pick it up? I might do but don't assume I will. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings, Staff Engineer, Solarflare Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job. They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.