From: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com>,
dingtianhong@huawei.com, Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>,
Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 3/3] bonding: fix __get_active_agg() RCU logic
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2014 11:48:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1389264510-22141-4-git-send-email-vfalico@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1389264510-22141-1-git-send-email-vfalico@redhat.com>
Currently, the implementation is meaningless - once again, we take the
slave structure and use it after we've exited RCU critical section.
Fix this by removing the rcu_read_lock() from __get_active_agg(), and
ensuring that all its callers are holding either RCU or RTNL lock.
Fixes: be79bd048 ("bonding: add RCU for bond_3ad_state_machine_handler()")
CC: dingtianhong@huawei.com
CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>
CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net>
Signed-off-by: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com>
---
drivers/net/bonding/bond_3ad.c | 10 ++++------
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_3ad.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_3ad.c
index 70e72d7..587fd7e 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_3ad.c
+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_3ad.c
@@ -674,6 +674,8 @@ static u32 __get_agg_bandwidth(struct aggregator *aggregator)
/**
* __get_active_agg - get the current active aggregator
* @aggregator: the aggregator we're looking at
+ *
+ * Caller must hold either RCU or RTNL lock.
*/
static struct aggregator *__get_active_agg(struct aggregator *aggregator)
{
@@ -681,13 +683,9 @@ static struct aggregator *__get_active_agg(struct aggregator *aggregator)
struct list_head *iter;
struct slave *slave;
- rcu_read_lock();
bond_for_each_slave_rcu(bond, slave, iter)
- if (SLAVE_AD_INFO(slave).aggregator.is_active) {
- rcu_read_unlock();
+ if (SLAVE_AD_INFO(slave).aggregator.is_active)
return &(SLAVE_AD_INFO(slave).aggregator);
- }
- rcu_read_unlock();
return NULL;
}
@@ -1495,11 +1493,11 @@ static void ad_agg_selection_logic(struct aggregator *agg)
struct slave *slave;
struct port *port;
+ rcu_read_lock();
origin = agg;
active = __get_active_agg(agg);
best = (active && agg_device_up(active)) ? active : NULL;
- rcu_read_lock();
bond_for_each_slave_rcu(bond, slave, iter) {
agg = &(SLAVE_AD_INFO(slave).aggregator);
--
1.8.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-09 10:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-09 10:48 [PATCH net-next 0/3] bonding: fix bond_3ad RCU usage Veaceslav Falico
2014-01-09 10:48 ` [PATCH net-next 1/3] bonding: fix bond_3ad_set_carrier() " Veaceslav Falico
2014-01-09 10:48 ` [PATCH net-next 2/3] bonding: fix __get_first_agg " Veaceslav Falico
2014-01-09 10:48 ` Veaceslav Falico [this message]
2014-01-09 10:56 ` [PATCH net-next 0/3] bonding: fix bond_3ad " Veaceslav Falico
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1389264510-22141-4-git-send-email-vfalico@redhat.com \
--to=vfalico@redhat.com \
--cc=andy@greyhouse.net \
--cc=dingtianhong@huawei.com \
--cc=fubar@us.ibm.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).