From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paul Bolle Subject: Re: [PATCH] xprtrdma: silence frame size warning Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 20:35:50 +0100 Message-ID: <1389641750.19054.9.camel@x220> References: <1389627955.20467.9.camel@x41> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: Trond Myklebust , "J. Bruce Fields" , "Miller David S." , Linux NFS Mailing List , netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, LKML Kernel To: Chuck Lever Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-nfs-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2014-01-13 at 11:17 -0500, Chuck Lever wrote: > I=E2=80=99m building a queue of NFS/RDMA work on bugzilla.kernel.org.= Let=E2=80=99s > create a defect report there to document this, and it will get > prioritized with the rest. Paul, can you do that to start us off? > Product =E2=80=9CFile system=E2=80=9D, Component =E2=80=9CNFS=E2=80=9D= =2E Sure, see https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D68661 . Please feel free to edit the bug's title, etc, as you see fit. > I can=E2=80=99t say that a warning on 32-bit x86 is going to be an es= pecially > high priority. I see. 32-bit x86 seems to be dropping in relevance quite fast. On the other hand, this is one of the last warnings I see when currentl= y building x86 (32-bit, that is) and it would be rather nice to see this warning gone. Since my .config is basically a Fedora 20 .config, that would help make Fedora's 32-bit x86 build (almost) warning free too.=20 > However, the underlying issue of allocating arrays of data segments o= n > the stack is something that needs extended attention, and is already > in plan. Thanks, Paul Bolle -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html