* [PATCHv2 net-next 0/4] Make flow cache name space aware @ 2014-01-14 1:39 Fan Du 2014-01-14 1:39 ` [PATCHv2 net-next 1/4] flowcache: Namespacify flowcache global parameters with xfrm Fan Du ` (3 more replies) 0 siblings, 4 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Fan Du @ 2014-01-14 1:39 UTC (permalink / raw) To: steffen.klassert; +Cc: davem, netdev Hi, This patch set aims to make flow cache operating in a per net style when inserting flow cache entry or flush flow cache. The reason to do so is not much compelling but reasonable, which is flushing flow cache in original implementation has global effective, the collateral damage is netns with only a few flow cache entries has gone. So this patch make flow cache running in a per net scope. Operation from different netns won't interfere with each other. And the flushing operation is worthwhile for the netns which supposed to be. v2: - Pick up newly created file include/net/flowcache.h missed in v1. Fan Du (4): flowcache: Namespacify flowcache global parameters with xfrm flowcache: Make flowcache entry inserting/flushing in per-net style flowcache: Fixup flow cache part in xfrm policy flowcache: Bring net/core/flow.c under IPsec maintain scope MAINTAINERS | 1 + include/net/flow.h | 5 +- include/net/flowcache.h | 25 +++++++++ include/net/netns/xfrm.h | 11 ++++ net/core/flow.c | 127 +++++++++++++++++++++------------------------- net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c | 7 +-- 6 files changed, 101 insertions(+), 75 deletions(-) create mode 100644 include/net/flowcache.h -- 1.7.9.5 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [PATCHv2 net-next 1/4] flowcache: Namespacify flowcache global parameters with xfrm 2014-01-14 1:39 [PATCHv2 net-next 0/4] Make flow cache name space aware Fan Du @ 2014-01-14 1:39 ` Fan Du 2014-01-14 18:53 ` Sabrina Dubroca 2014-01-14 1:39 ` [PATCHv2 net-next 2/4] flowcache: Make flowcache entry inserting/flushing in per-net style Fan Du ` (2 subsequent siblings) 3 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Fan Du @ 2014-01-14 1:39 UTC (permalink / raw) To: steffen.klassert; +Cc: davem, netdev Since flowcache is tightly coupled with IPsec, so it would be easier to put flow cache global parameters here into xfrm namespace part. Signed-off-by: Fan Du <fan.du@windriver.com> --- include/net/netns/xfrm.h | 11 +++++++++++ 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+) diff --git a/include/net/netns/xfrm.h b/include/net/netns/xfrm.h index 1006a26..52d0086 100644 --- a/include/net/netns/xfrm.h +++ b/include/net/netns/xfrm.h @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ #include <linux/workqueue.h> #include <linux/xfrm.h> #include <net/dst_ops.h> +#include <net/flowcache.h> struct ctl_table_header; @@ -61,6 +62,16 @@ struct netns_xfrm { spinlock_t xfrm_policy_sk_bundle_lock; rwlock_t xfrm_policy_lock; struct mutex xfrm_cfg_mutex; + + /* flow cache part */ + struct flow_cache flow_cache_global; + struct kmem_cache *flow_cachep; + atomic_t flow_cache_genid; + struct list_head flow_cache_gc_list; + spinlock_t flow_cache_gc_lock; + struct work_struct flow_cache_gc_work; + struct work_struct flow_cache_flush_work; + struct mutex flow_flush_sem; }; #endif -- 1.7.9.5 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCHv2 net-next 1/4] flowcache: Namespacify flowcache global parameters with xfrm 2014-01-14 1:39 ` [PATCHv2 net-next 1/4] flowcache: Namespacify flowcache global parameters with xfrm Fan Du @ 2014-01-14 18:53 ` Sabrina Dubroca 0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Sabrina Dubroca @ 2014-01-14 18:53 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Fan Du; +Cc: steffen.klassert, davem, netdev 2014-01-14, 09:39:44 +0800, Fan Du wrote: > Since flowcache is tightly coupled with IPsec, so it would be > easier to put flow cache global parameters here into xfrm > namespace part. > > Signed-off-by: Fan Du <fan.du@windriver.com> > --- > include/net/netns/xfrm.h | 11 +++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/include/net/netns/xfrm.h b/include/net/netns/xfrm.h > index 1006a26..52d0086 100644 > --- a/include/net/netns/xfrm.h > +++ b/include/net/netns/xfrm.h > @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ > #include <linux/workqueue.h> > #include <linux/xfrm.h> > #include <net/dst_ops.h> > +#include <net/flowcache.h> You are including a file that doesn't exist yet. You create it later, with patch 2. This breaks bisection. -- Sabrina ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [PATCHv2 net-next 2/4] flowcache: Make flowcache entry inserting/flushing in per-net style 2014-01-14 1:39 [PATCHv2 net-next 0/4] Make flow cache name space aware Fan Du 2014-01-14 1:39 ` [PATCHv2 net-next 1/4] flowcache: Namespacify flowcache global parameters with xfrm Fan Du @ 2014-01-14 1:39 ` Fan Du 2014-01-14 1:39 ` [PATCHv2 net-next 3/4] flowcache: Fixup flow cache part in xfrm policy Fan Du 2014-01-14 1:39 ` [PATCHv2 net-next 4/4] flowcache: Bring net/core/flow.c under IPsec maintain scope Fan Du 3 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Fan Du @ 2014-01-14 1:39 UTC (permalink / raw) To: steffen.klassert; +Cc: davem, netdev Inserting a entry into flowcache, or flushing flowcache should be based on per net scope. The reason to do so is flushing operation from fat netns crammed with flow entries will also making the slim netns with only a few flow cache entries go away in original implementation. Signed-off-by: Fan Du <fan.du@windriver.com> --- include/net/flow.h | 5 +- include/net/flowcache.h | 25 ++++++++++ net/core/flow.c | 127 +++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------- 3 files changed, 85 insertions(+), 72 deletions(-) create mode 100644 include/net/flowcache.h diff --git a/include/net/flow.h b/include/net/flow.h index d23e7fa..bee3741 100644 --- a/include/net/flow.h +++ b/include/net/flow.h @@ -218,9 +218,10 @@ struct flow_cache_object *flow_cache_lookup(struct net *net, const struct flowi *key, u16 family, u8 dir, flow_resolve_t resolver, void *ctx); +int flow_cache_init(struct net *net); -void flow_cache_flush(void); -void flow_cache_flush_deferred(void); +void flow_cache_flush(struct net *net); +void flow_cache_flush_deferred(struct net *net); extern atomic_t flow_cache_genid; #endif diff --git a/include/net/flowcache.h b/include/net/flowcache.h new file mode 100644 index 0000000..c8f665e --- /dev/null +++ b/include/net/flowcache.h @@ -0,0 +1,25 @@ +#ifndef _NET_FLOWCACHE_H +#define _NET_FLOWCACHE_H + +#include <linux/interrupt.h> +#include <linux/types.h> +#include <linux/timer.h> +#include <linux/notifier.h> + +struct flow_cache_percpu { + struct hlist_head *hash_table; + int hash_count; + u32 hash_rnd; + int hash_rnd_recalc; + struct tasklet_struct flush_tasklet; +}; + +struct flow_cache { + u32 hash_shift; + struct flow_cache_percpu __percpu *percpu; + struct notifier_block hotcpu_notifier; + int low_watermark; + int high_watermark; + struct timer_list rnd_timer; +}; +#endif /* _NET_FLOWCACHE_H */ diff --git a/net/core/flow.c b/net/core/flow.c index dfa602c..344a184 100644 --- a/net/core/flow.c +++ b/net/core/flow.c @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ #include <net/flow.h> #include <linux/atomic.h> #include <linux/security.h> +#include <net/net_namespace.h> struct flow_cache_entry { union { @@ -38,37 +39,12 @@ struct flow_cache_entry { struct flow_cache_object *object; }; -struct flow_cache_percpu { - struct hlist_head *hash_table; - int hash_count; - u32 hash_rnd; - int hash_rnd_recalc; - struct tasklet_struct flush_tasklet; -}; - struct flow_flush_info { struct flow_cache *cache; atomic_t cpuleft; struct completion completion; }; -struct flow_cache { - u32 hash_shift; - struct flow_cache_percpu __percpu *percpu; - struct notifier_block hotcpu_notifier; - int low_watermark; - int high_watermark; - struct timer_list rnd_timer; -}; - -atomic_t flow_cache_genid = ATOMIC_INIT(0); -EXPORT_SYMBOL(flow_cache_genid); -static struct flow_cache flow_cache_global; -static struct kmem_cache *flow_cachep __read_mostly; - -static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(flow_cache_gc_lock); -static LIST_HEAD(flow_cache_gc_list); - #define flow_cache_hash_size(cache) (1 << (cache)->hash_shift) #define FLOW_HASH_RND_PERIOD (10 * 60 * HZ) @@ -84,46 +60,50 @@ static void flow_cache_new_hashrnd(unsigned long arg) add_timer(&fc->rnd_timer); } -static int flow_entry_valid(struct flow_cache_entry *fle) +static int flow_entry_valid(struct flow_cache_entry *fle, + struct netns_xfrm *xfrm) { - if (atomic_read(&flow_cache_genid) != fle->genid) + if (atomic_read(&xfrm->flow_cache_genid) != fle->genid) return 0; if (fle->object && !fle->object->ops->check(fle->object)) return 0; return 1; } -static void flow_entry_kill(struct flow_cache_entry *fle) +static void flow_entry_kill(struct flow_cache_entry *fle, + struct netns_xfrm *xfrm) { if (fle->object) fle->object->ops->delete(fle->object); - kmem_cache_free(flow_cachep, fle); + kmem_cache_free(xfrm->flow_cachep, fle); } static void flow_cache_gc_task(struct work_struct *work) { struct list_head gc_list; struct flow_cache_entry *fce, *n; + struct netns_xfrm *xfrm = container_of(work, struct netns_xfrm, + flow_cache_gc_work); INIT_LIST_HEAD(&gc_list); - spin_lock_bh(&flow_cache_gc_lock); - list_splice_tail_init(&flow_cache_gc_list, &gc_list); - spin_unlock_bh(&flow_cache_gc_lock); + spin_lock_bh(&xfrm->flow_cache_gc_lock); + list_splice_tail_init(&xfrm->flow_cache_gc_list, &gc_list); + spin_unlock_bh(&xfrm->flow_cache_gc_lock); list_for_each_entry_safe(fce, n, &gc_list, u.gc_list) - flow_entry_kill(fce); + flow_entry_kill(fce, xfrm); } -static DECLARE_WORK(flow_cache_gc_work, flow_cache_gc_task); static void flow_cache_queue_garbage(struct flow_cache_percpu *fcp, - int deleted, struct list_head *gc_list) + int deleted, struct list_head *gc_list, + struct netns_xfrm *xfrm) { if (deleted) { fcp->hash_count -= deleted; - spin_lock_bh(&flow_cache_gc_lock); - list_splice_tail(gc_list, &flow_cache_gc_list); - spin_unlock_bh(&flow_cache_gc_lock); - schedule_work(&flow_cache_gc_work); + spin_lock_bh(&xfrm->flow_cache_gc_lock); + list_splice_tail(gc_list, &xfrm->flow_cache_gc_list); + spin_unlock_bh(&xfrm->flow_cache_gc_lock); + schedule_work(&xfrm->flow_cache_gc_work); } } @@ -135,6 +115,8 @@ static void __flow_cache_shrink(struct flow_cache *fc, struct hlist_node *tmp; LIST_HEAD(gc_list); int i, deleted = 0; + struct netns_xfrm *xfrm = container_of(fc, struct netns_xfrm, + flow_cache_global); for (i = 0; i < flow_cache_hash_size(fc); i++) { int saved = 0; @@ -142,7 +124,7 @@ static void __flow_cache_shrink(struct flow_cache *fc, hlist_for_each_entry_safe(fle, tmp, &fcp->hash_table[i], u.hlist) { if (saved < shrink_to && - flow_entry_valid(fle)) { + flow_entry_valid(fle, xfrm)) { saved++; } else { deleted++; @@ -152,7 +134,7 @@ static void __flow_cache_shrink(struct flow_cache *fc, } } - flow_cache_queue_garbage(fcp, deleted, &gc_list); + flow_cache_queue_garbage(fcp, deleted, &gc_list, xfrm); } static void flow_cache_shrink(struct flow_cache *fc, @@ -208,7 +190,7 @@ struct flow_cache_object * flow_cache_lookup(struct net *net, const struct flowi *key, u16 family, u8 dir, flow_resolve_t resolver, void *ctx) { - struct flow_cache *fc = &flow_cache_global; + struct flow_cache *fc = &net->xfrm.flow_cache_global; struct flow_cache_percpu *fcp; struct flow_cache_entry *fle, *tfle; struct flow_cache_object *flo; @@ -248,7 +230,7 @@ flow_cache_lookup(struct net *net, const struct flowi *key, u16 family, u8 dir, if (fcp->hash_count > fc->high_watermark) flow_cache_shrink(fc, fcp); - fle = kmem_cache_alloc(flow_cachep, GFP_ATOMIC); + fle = kmem_cache_alloc(net->xfrm.flow_cachep, GFP_ATOMIC); if (fle) { fle->net = net; fle->family = family; @@ -258,7 +240,7 @@ flow_cache_lookup(struct net *net, const struct flowi *key, u16 family, u8 dir, hlist_add_head(&fle->u.hlist, &fcp->hash_table[hash]); fcp->hash_count++; } - } else if (likely(fle->genid == atomic_read(&flow_cache_genid))) { + } else if (likely(fle->genid == atomic_read(&net->xfrm.flow_cache_genid))) { flo = fle->object; if (!flo) goto ret_object; @@ -279,7 +261,7 @@ nocache: } flo = resolver(net, key, family, dir, flo, ctx); if (fle) { - fle->genid = atomic_read(&flow_cache_genid); + fle->genid = atomic_read(&net->xfrm.flow_cache_genid); if (!IS_ERR(flo)) fle->object = flo; else @@ -303,12 +285,14 @@ static void flow_cache_flush_tasklet(unsigned long data) struct hlist_node *tmp; LIST_HEAD(gc_list); int i, deleted = 0; + struct netns_xfrm *xfrm = container_of(fc, struct netns_xfrm, + flow_cache_global); fcp = this_cpu_ptr(fc->percpu); for (i = 0; i < flow_cache_hash_size(fc); i++) { hlist_for_each_entry_safe(fle, tmp, &fcp->hash_table[i], u.hlist) { - if (flow_entry_valid(fle)) + if (flow_entry_valid(fle, xfrm)) continue; deleted++; @@ -317,7 +301,7 @@ static void flow_cache_flush_tasklet(unsigned long data) } } - flow_cache_queue_garbage(fcp, deleted, &gc_list); + flow_cache_queue_garbage(fcp, deleted, &gc_list, xfrm); if (atomic_dec_and_test(&info->cpuleft)) complete(&info->completion); @@ -351,10 +335,9 @@ static void flow_cache_flush_per_cpu(void *data) tasklet_schedule(tasklet); } -void flow_cache_flush(void) +void flow_cache_flush(struct net *net) { struct flow_flush_info info; - static DEFINE_MUTEX(flow_flush_sem); cpumask_var_t mask; int i, self; @@ -365,8 +348,8 @@ void flow_cache_flush(void) /* Don't want cpus going down or up during this. */ get_online_cpus(); - mutex_lock(&flow_flush_sem); - info.cache = &flow_cache_global; + mutex_lock(&net->xfrm.flow_flush_sem); + info.cache = &net->xfrm.flow_cache_global; for_each_online_cpu(i) if (!flow_cache_percpu_empty(info.cache, i)) cpumask_set_cpu(i, mask); @@ -386,21 +369,23 @@ void flow_cache_flush(void) wait_for_completion(&info.completion); done: - mutex_unlock(&flow_flush_sem); + mutex_unlock(&net->xfrm.flow_flush_sem); put_online_cpus(); free_cpumask_var(mask); } static void flow_cache_flush_task(struct work_struct *work) { - flow_cache_flush(); -} + struct netns_xfrm *xfrm = container_of(work, struct netns_xfrm, + flow_cache_gc_work); + struct net *net = container_of(xfrm, struct net, xfrm); -static DECLARE_WORK(flow_cache_flush_work, flow_cache_flush_task); + flow_cache_flush(net); +} -void flow_cache_flush_deferred(void) +void flow_cache_flush_deferred(struct net *net) { - schedule_work(&flow_cache_flush_work); + schedule_work(&net->xfrm.flow_cache_flush_work); } static int flow_cache_cpu_prepare(struct flow_cache *fc, int cpu) @@ -425,7 +410,8 @@ static int flow_cache_cpu(struct notifier_block *nfb, unsigned long action, void *hcpu) { - struct flow_cache *fc = container_of(nfb, struct flow_cache, hotcpu_notifier); + struct flow_cache *fc = container_of(nfb, struct flow_cache, + hotcpu_notifier); int res, cpu = (unsigned long) hcpu; struct flow_cache_percpu *fcp = per_cpu_ptr(fc->percpu, cpu); @@ -444,9 +430,20 @@ static int flow_cache_cpu(struct notifier_block *nfb, return NOTIFY_OK; } -static int __init flow_cache_init(struct flow_cache *fc) +int flow_cache_init(struct net *net) { int i; + struct flow_cache *fc = &net->xfrm.flow_cache_global; + + /* Initialize per-net flow cache global variables here */ + net->xfrm.flow_cachep = kmem_cache_create("flow_cache", + sizeof(struct flow_cache_entry), + 0, SLAB_PANIC, NULL); + spin_lock_init(&net->xfrm.flow_cache_gc_lock); + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&net->xfrm.flow_cache_gc_list); + INIT_WORK(&net->xfrm.flow_cache_gc_work, flow_cache_gc_task); + INIT_WORK(&net->xfrm.flow_cache_flush_work, flow_cache_flush_task); + mutex_init(&net->xfrm.flow_flush_sem); fc->hash_shift = 10; fc->low_watermark = 2 * flow_cache_hash_size(fc); @@ -484,14 +481,4 @@ err: return -ENOMEM; } - -static int __init flow_cache_init_global(void) -{ - flow_cachep = kmem_cache_create("flow_cache", - sizeof(struct flow_cache_entry), - 0, SLAB_PANIC, NULL); - - return flow_cache_init(&flow_cache_global); -} - -module_init(flow_cache_init_global); +EXPORT_SYMBOL(flow_cache_init); -- 1.7.9.5 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [PATCHv2 net-next 3/4] flowcache: Fixup flow cache part in xfrm policy 2014-01-14 1:39 [PATCHv2 net-next 0/4] Make flow cache name space aware Fan Du 2014-01-14 1:39 ` [PATCHv2 net-next 1/4] flowcache: Namespacify flowcache global parameters with xfrm Fan Du 2014-01-14 1:39 ` [PATCHv2 net-next 2/4] flowcache: Make flowcache entry inserting/flushing in per-net style Fan Du @ 2014-01-14 1:39 ` Fan Du 2014-01-14 18:59 ` Sabrina Dubroca 2014-01-14 1:39 ` [PATCHv2 net-next 4/4] flowcache: Bring net/core/flow.c under IPsec maintain scope Fan Du 3 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Fan Du @ 2014-01-14 1:39 UTC (permalink / raw) To: steffen.klassert; +Cc: davem, netdev Bump flow cache genid, and flush flow cache should also be made in per net style. Signed-off-by: Fan Du <fan.du@windriver.com> --- net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c | 7 ++++--- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c index e205c4b..d39c90f 100644 --- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c +++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c @@ -661,7 +661,7 @@ int xfrm_policy_insert(int dir, struct xfrm_policy *policy, int excl) hlist_add_head(&policy->bydst, chain); xfrm_pol_hold(policy); net->xfrm.policy_count[dir]++; - atomic_inc(&flow_cache_genid); + atomic_inc(&net->xfrm.flow_cache_genid); /* After previous checking, family can either be AF_INET or AF_INET6 */ if (policy->family == AF_INET) @@ -2567,14 +2567,14 @@ static void __xfrm_garbage_collect(struct net *net) void xfrm_garbage_collect(struct net *net) { - flow_cache_flush(); + flow_cache_flush(net); __xfrm_garbage_collect(net); } EXPORT_SYMBOL(xfrm_garbage_collect); static void xfrm_garbage_collect_deferred(struct net *net) { - flow_cache_flush_deferred(); + flow_cache_flush_deferred(net); __xfrm_garbage_collect(net); } @@ -2947,6 +2947,7 @@ static int __net_init xfrm_net_init(struct net *net) spin_lock_init(&net->xfrm.xfrm_policy_sk_bundle_lock); mutex_init(&net->xfrm.xfrm_cfg_mutex); + flow_cache_init(net); return 0; out_sysctl: -- 1.7.9.5 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCHv2 net-next 3/4] flowcache: Fixup flow cache part in xfrm policy 2014-01-14 1:39 ` [PATCHv2 net-next 3/4] flowcache: Fixup flow cache part in xfrm policy Fan Du @ 2014-01-14 18:59 ` Sabrina Dubroca 2014-01-15 7:19 ` Fan Du 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Sabrina Dubroca @ 2014-01-14 18:59 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Fan Du; +Cc: steffen.klassert, davem, netdev 2014-01-14, 09:39:46 +0800, Fan Du wrote: > Bump flow cache genid, and flush flow cache should also be made > in per net style. > > Signed-off-by: Fan Du <fan.du@windriver.com> > --- > net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c | 7 ++++--- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c > index e205c4b..d39c90f 100644 > --- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c > +++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c > @@ -661,7 +661,7 @@ int xfrm_policy_insert(int dir, struct xfrm_policy *policy, int excl) > hlist_add_head(&policy->bydst, chain); > xfrm_pol_hold(policy); > net->xfrm.policy_count[dir]++; > - atomic_inc(&flow_cache_genid); > + atomic_inc(&net->xfrm.flow_cache_genid); > > /* After previous checking, family can either be AF_INET or AF_INET6 */ > if (policy->family == AF_INET) > @@ -2567,14 +2567,14 @@ static void __xfrm_garbage_collect(struct net *net) > > void xfrm_garbage_collect(struct net *net) > { > - flow_cache_flush(); > + flow_cache_flush(net); > __xfrm_garbage_collect(net); > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL(xfrm_garbage_collect); > > static void xfrm_garbage_collect_deferred(struct net *net) > { > - flow_cache_flush_deferred(); > + flow_cache_flush_deferred(net); > __xfrm_garbage_collect(net); > } > > @@ -2947,6 +2947,7 @@ static int __net_init xfrm_net_init(struct net *net) > spin_lock_init(&net->xfrm.xfrm_policy_sk_bundle_lock); > mutex_init(&net->xfrm.xfrm_cfg_mutex); > > + flow_cache_init(net); > return 0; > > out_sysctl: You didn't address Cong Wang's comments for v1: 2014-01-13, 11:42:47 -0800, Cong Wang wrote: > On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 11:49 PM, Fan Du <fan.du@windriver.com> wrote: > > void xfrm_garbage_collect(struct net *net) > > { > > - flow_cache_flush(); > > + flow_cache_flush(net); > > __xfrm_garbage_collect(net); > > } > > EXPORT_SYMBOL(xfrm_garbage_collect); > > > > static void xfrm_garbage_collect_deferred(struct net *net) > > { > > - flow_cache_flush_deferred(); > > + flow_cache_flush_deferred(net); > > __xfrm_garbage_collect(net); > > } > > > > You changed the prototypes of flow_cache_flush*() in the previous > patch, so, here you break bisect. They have to be in one commit. -- Sabrina ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCHv2 net-next 3/4] flowcache: Fixup flow cache part in xfrm policy 2014-01-14 18:59 ` Sabrina Dubroca @ 2014-01-15 7:19 ` Fan Du 0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Fan Du @ 2014-01-15 7:19 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Sabrina Dubroca, 王聪; +Cc: Steffen Klassert, davem, netdev On 2014年01月15日 02:59, Sabrina Dubroca wrote: > 2014-01-14, 09:39:46 +0800, Fan Du wrote: >> Bump flow cache genid, and flush flow cache should also be made >> in per net style. >> >> Signed-off-by: Fan Du<fan.du@windriver.com> >> --- >> net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c | 7 ++++--- >> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c >> index e205c4b..d39c90f 100644 >> --- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c >> +++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c >> @@ -661,7 +661,7 @@ int xfrm_policy_insert(int dir, struct xfrm_policy *policy, int excl) >> hlist_add_head(&policy->bydst, chain); >> xfrm_pol_hold(policy); >> net->xfrm.policy_count[dir]++; >> - atomic_inc(&flow_cache_genid); >> + atomic_inc(&net->xfrm.flow_cache_genid); >> >> /* After previous checking, family can either be AF_INET or AF_INET6 */ >> if (policy->family == AF_INET) >> @@ -2567,14 +2567,14 @@ static void __xfrm_garbage_collect(struct net *net) >> >> void xfrm_garbage_collect(struct net *net) >> { >> - flow_cache_flush(); >> + flow_cache_flush(net); >> __xfrm_garbage_collect(net); >> } >> EXPORT_SYMBOL(xfrm_garbage_collect); >> >> static void xfrm_garbage_collect_deferred(struct net *net) >> { >> - flow_cache_flush_deferred(); >> + flow_cache_flush_deferred(net); >> __xfrm_garbage_collect(net); >> } >> >> @@ -2947,6 +2947,7 @@ static int __net_init xfrm_net_init(struct net *net) >> spin_lock_init(&net->xfrm.xfrm_policy_sk_bundle_lock); >> mutex_init(&net->xfrm.xfrm_cfg_mutex); >> >> + flow_cache_init(net); >> return 0; >> >> out_sysctl: > > > You didn't address Cong Wang's comments for v1: Sorry, seems company email server didn't forward below message to me。。。 but I saw yours. I'm happy to forge the relevant patches into one single patch in next next version :) if Steffen doesn't complain. > > 2014-01-13, 11:42:47 -0800, Cong Wang wrote: >> On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 11:49 PM, Fan Du<fan.du@windriver.com> wrote: >>> void xfrm_garbage_collect(struct net *net) >>> { >>> - flow_cache_flush(); >>> + flow_cache_flush(net); >>> __xfrm_garbage_collect(net); >>> } >>> EXPORT_SYMBOL(xfrm_garbage_collect); >>> >>> static void xfrm_garbage_collect_deferred(struct net *net) >>> { >>> - flow_cache_flush_deferred(); >>> + flow_cache_flush_deferred(net); >>> __xfrm_garbage_collect(net); >>> } >>> >> >> You changed the prototypes of flow_cache_flush*() in the previous >> patch, so, here you break bisect. They have to be in one commit. > > -- 浮沉随浪只记今朝笑 --fan ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [PATCHv2 net-next 4/4] flowcache: Bring net/core/flow.c under IPsec maintain scope 2014-01-14 1:39 [PATCHv2 net-next 0/4] Make flow cache name space aware Fan Du ` (2 preceding siblings ...) 2014-01-14 1:39 ` [PATCHv2 net-next 3/4] flowcache: Fixup flow cache part in xfrm policy Fan Du @ 2014-01-14 1:39 ` Fan Du 3 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Fan Du @ 2014-01-14 1:39 UTC (permalink / raw) To: steffen.klassert; +Cc: davem, netdev As flow cache is mainly manipulated from IPsec. Signed-off-by: Fan Du <fan.du@windriver.com> --- MAINTAINERS | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS index e11d495..14ad385 100644 --- a/MAINTAINERS +++ b/MAINTAINERS @@ -5916,6 +5916,7 @@ L: netdev@vger.kernel.org T: git git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/klassert/ipsec.git T: git git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/klassert/ipsec-next.git S: Maintained +F: net/core/flow.c F: net/xfrm/ F: net/key/ F: net/ipv4/xfrm* -- 1.7.9.5 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-01-15 7:19 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2014-01-14 1:39 [PATCHv2 net-next 0/4] Make flow cache name space aware Fan Du 2014-01-14 1:39 ` [PATCHv2 net-next 1/4] flowcache: Namespacify flowcache global parameters with xfrm Fan Du 2014-01-14 18:53 ` Sabrina Dubroca 2014-01-14 1:39 ` [PATCHv2 net-next 2/4] flowcache: Make flowcache entry inserting/flushing in per-net style Fan Du 2014-01-14 1:39 ` [PATCHv2 net-next 3/4] flowcache: Fixup flow cache part in xfrm policy Fan Du 2014-01-14 18:59 ` Sabrina Dubroca 2014-01-15 7:19 ` Fan Du 2014-01-14 1:39 ` [PATCHv2 net-next 4/4] flowcache: Bring net/core/flow.c under IPsec maintain scope Fan Du
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).