From: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com>,
Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>,
Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net>
Subject: [PATCH v3 net-next 2/2] bonding: restructure locking of bond_ab_arp_probe()
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 14:33:33 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1390829613-1842-3-git-send-email-vfalico@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1390829613-1842-1-git-send-email-vfalico@redhat.com>
Currently we're calling it from under RCU context, however we're using some
functions that require rtnl to be held.
Fix this by restructuring the locking - don't call it under any locks,
aquire rcu_read_lock() if we're sending _only_ (i.e. we have the active
slave present), and use rtnl locking otherwise - if we need to modify
(in)active flags of a slave.
CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>
CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net>
Signed-off-by: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com>
---
Notes:
v2->v3:
Use rtnl_trylock(), not to race with queue cancelling.
v1->v2:
Add two steps - one for sending/rcu, another for modifying/rtnl.
drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
index 27e6fdd..7de0256 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
@@ -2605,11 +2605,14 @@ do_failover:
static void bond_ab_arp_probe(struct bonding *bond)
{
struct slave *slave, *before = NULL, *new_slave = NULL,
- *curr_arp_slave = rcu_dereference(bond->current_arp_slave),
- *curr_active_slave = rcu_dereference(bond->curr_active_slave);
+ *curr_arp_slave, *curr_active_slave;
struct list_head *iter;
bool found = false;
+ rcu_read_lock();
+ curr_arp_slave = rcu_dereference(bond->current_arp_slave);
+ curr_active_slave = rcu_dereference(bond->curr_active_slave);
+
if (curr_arp_slave && curr_active_slave)
pr_info("PROBE: c_arp %s && cas %s BAD\n",
curr_arp_slave->dev->name,
@@ -2617,23 +2620,31 @@ static void bond_ab_arp_probe(struct bonding *bond)
if (curr_active_slave) {
bond_arp_send_all(bond, curr_active_slave);
+ rcu_read_unlock();
return;
}
+ rcu_read_unlock();
/* if we don't have a curr_active_slave, search for the next available
* backup slave from the current_arp_slave and make it the candidate
* for becoming the curr_active_slave
*/
+ rtnl_lock();
+ /* curr_arp_slave might have gone away */
+ curr_arp_slave = rcu_dereference(bond->current_arp_slave);
+
if (!curr_arp_slave) {
- curr_arp_slave = bond_first_slave_rcu(bond);
- if (!curr_arp_slave)
+ curr_arp_slave = bond_first_slave(bond);
+ if (!curr_arp_slave) {
+ rtnl_unlock();
return;
+ }
}
bond_set_slave_inactive_flags(curr_arp_slave);
- bond_for_each_slave_rcu(bond, slave, iter) {
+ bond_for_each_slave(bond, slave, iter) {
if (!found && !before && IS_UP(slave->dev))
before = slave;
@@ -2663,21 +2674,24 @@ static void bond_ab_arp_probe(struct bonding *bond)
if (!new_slave && before)
new_slave = before;
- if (!new_slave)
+ if (!new_slave) {
+ rtnl_unlock();
return;
+ }
new_slave->link = BOND_LINK_BACK;
bond_set_slave_active_flags(new_slave);
bond_arp_send_all(bond, new_slave);
new_slave->jiffies = jiffies;
rcu_assign_pointer(bond->current_arp_slave, new_slave);
+ rtnl_unlock();
}
static void bond_activebackup_arp_mon(struct work_struct *work)
{
struct bonding *bond = container_of(work, struct bonding,
arp_work.work);
- bool should_notify_peers = false;
+ bool should_notify_peers = false, should_commit = false;
int delta_in_ticks;
delta_in_ticks = msecs_to_jiffies(bond->params.arp_interval);
@@ -2686,12 +2700,11 @@ static void bond_activebackup_arp_mon(struct work_struct *work)
goto re_arm;
rcu_read_lock();
-
should_notify_peers = bond_should_notify_peers(bond);
+ should_commit = bond_ab_arp_inspect(bond);
+ rcu_read_unlock();
- if (bond_ab_arp_inspect(bond)) {
- rcu_read_unlock();
-
+ if (should_commit) {
/* Race avoidance with bond_close flush of workqueue */
if (!rtnl_trylock()) {
delta_in_ticks = 1;
@@ -2700,13 +2713,10 @@ static void bond_activebackup_arp_mon(struct work_struct *work)
}
bond_ab_arp_commit(bond);
-
rtnl_unlock();
- rcu_read_lock();
}
bond_ab_arp_probe(bond);
- rcu_read_unlock();
re_arm:
if (bond->params.arp_interval)
--
1.8.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-27 13:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-27 13:33 [PATCH v3 net-next 0/2] bonding: fix locking in bond_ab_arp_probe Veaceslav Falico
2014-01-27 13:33 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 1/2] bonding: RCUify bond_ab_arp_probe Veaceslav Falico
2014-01-27 13:33 ` Veaceslav Falico [this message]
2014-01-27 13:36 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 2/2] bonding: restructure locking of bond_ab_arp_probe() Veaceslav Falico
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-01-27 13:37 [PATCH v3 net-next 0/2] bonding: fix locking in bond_ab_arp_prob Veaceslav Falico
2014-01-27 13:37 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 2/2] bonding: restructure locking of bond_ab_arp_probe() Veaceslav Falico
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1390829613-1842-3-git-send-email-vfalico@redhat.com \
--to=vfalico@redhat.com \
--cc=andy@greyhouse.net \
--cc=fubar@us.ibm.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).