From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Joe Perches Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] openvswitch: Use net_ratelimit in OVS_NLERR Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2014 14:08:08 -0800 Message-ID: <1391465288.2538.1.camel@joe-AO722> References: <1391389686-34303-1-git-send-email-jesse@nicira.com> <1391389686-34303-6-git-send-email-jesse@nicira.com> <1391410526.2784.9.camel@joe-AO722> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev , David Miller , "dev-yBygre7rU0SM8Zsap4Y0gw@public.gmane.org" To: Jesse Gross Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: dev-bounces-yBygre7rU0TnMu66kgdUjQ@public.gmane.org Errors-To: dev-bounces-yBygre7rU0TnMu66kgdUjQ@public.gmane.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2014-02-03 at 13:46 -0800, Jesse Gross wrote: > On Sun, Feb 2, 2014 at 10:55 PM, Joe Perches wrote: > > Perhaps it'd make sense to use net_ratelimit() > > instead of printk_once for OVS_NLERR > > I guess I could see it going either way but I'm not sure I see a > strong argument for changing. pr__once is a per-site flag. Some of these messages look as if seeing them multiple times could be useful.