From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stefan =?ISO-8859-1?Q?S=F8rensen?= Subject: Re: [PATCH] dp83640: Get gpio and master/slave configuration from DT Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 09:01:25 +0100 Message-ID: <1392105685.2133.2.camel@e37108.spectralink.com> References: <1392037240-30913-1-git-send-email-stefan.sorensen@spectralink.com> <20140210184604.GA4296@netboy> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: , , , , To: Richard Cochran Return-path: Received: from mail-bl2lp0210.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([207.46.163.210]:17640 "EHLO na01-bl2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750776AbaBKIB6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Feb 2014 03:01:58 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20140210184604.GA4296@netboy> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, 2014-02-10 at 19:46 +0100, Richard Cochran wrote: > On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 02:00:40PM +0100, Stefan S=C3=B8rensen wrote: > > This patch removes the module parameters gpio_tab and chosen_phy in= favour of > > retrieving the configuration from DT through the properties >=20 > Can we please keep the module parameters? I have two platforms with > phyters neither of which will ever support DT, namely ixp and m68k, > and I want to run recent kernels on them. I will keep the module parameters as fallback. Will it be OK to split the gpio_tab parameter into separate calibrate-pin, perout-pins and extts-pins parameters? > > The configuration is now stored for each master clock device, allow= ing different=20 > > gpio setups for each master. >=20 > What do you mean by "each master"? Do you mean each individual PHY de= vice > or each group of PHYs on the same MDIO bus? I mean each group of PHYs. I will reword that. Stefan