From: "Andrew J. Bennieston" <andrew.bennieston@citrix.com>
To: <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, paul.durrant@citrix.com,
wei.liu2@citrix.com, ian.campbell@citrix.com,
david.vrabel@citrix.com
Subject: [PATCH V4 net-next 0/5] xen-net{back, front}: Multiple transmit and receive queues
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 17:57:55 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1392659880-2538-1-git-send-email-andrew.bennieston@citrix.com> (raw)
This patch series implements multiple transmit and receive queues (i.e.
multiple shared rings) for the xen virtual network interfaces.
The series is split up as follows:
- Patches 1 and 3 factor out the queue-specific data for netback and
netfront respectively, and modify the rest of the code to use these
as appropriate.
- Patches 2 and 4 introduce new XenStore keys to negotiate and use
multiple shared rings and event channels, and code to connect these
as appropriate.
- Patch 5 documents the XenStore keys required for the new feature
in include/xen/interface/io/netif.h
All other transmit and receive processing remains unchanged, i.e. there
is a kthread per queue and a NAPI context per queue.
The performance of these patches has been analysed in detail, with
results available at:
http://wiki.xenproject.org/wiki/Xen-netback_and_xen-netfront_multi-queue_performance_testing
To summarise:
* Using multiple queues allows a VM to transmit at line rate on a 10
Gbit/s NIC, compared with a maximum aggregate throughput of 6 Gbit/s
with a single queue.
* For intra-host VM--VM traffic, eight queues provide 171% of the
throughput of a single queue; almost 12 Gbit/s instead of 6 Gbit/s.
* There is a corresponding increase in total CPU usage, i.e. this is a
scaling out over available resources, not an efficiency improvement.
* Results depend on the availability of sufficient CPUs, as well as the
distribution of interrupts and the distribution of TCP streams across
the queues.
Queue selection is currently achieved via an L4 hash on the packet (i.e.
TCP src/dst port, IP src/dst address) and is not negotiated between the
frontend and backend, since only one option exists. Future patches to
support other frontends (particularly Windows) will need to add some
capability to negotiate not only the hash algorithm selection, but also
allow the frontend to specify some parameters to this.
Note that queue selection is a decision by the transmitting system about
which queue to use for a particular packet. In general, the algorithm
may differ between the frontend and the backend with no adverse effects.
Queue-specific XenStore entries for ring references and event channels
are stored hierarchically, i.e. under .../queue-N/... where N varies
from 0 to one less than the requested number of queues (inclusive). If
only one queue is requested, it falls back to the flat structure where
the ring references and event channels are written at the same level as
other vif information.
V4:
- Add MODULE_PARM_DESC() for the multi-queue parameters for netback
and netfront modules.
- Move del_timer_sync() in netfront to after unregister_netdev, which
restores the order in which these functions were called before applying
these patches.
V3:
- Further indentation and style fixups.
V2:
- Rebase onto net-next.
- Change queue->number to queue->id.
- Add atomic operations around the small number of stats variables that
are not queue-specific or per-cpu.
- Fixup formatting and style issues.
- XenStore protocol changes documented in netif.h.
- Default max. number of queues to num_online_cpus().
- Check requested number of queues does not exceed maximum.
--
Andrew J. Bennieston
next reply other threads:[~2014-02-17 17:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-17 17:57 Andrew J. Bennieston [this message]
2014-02-17 17:57 ` [PATCH V4 net-next 1/5] xen-netback: Factor queue-specific data into queue struct Andrew J. Bennieston
2014-02-21 12:08 ` Paul Durrant
2014-02-21 12:22 ` Andrew Bennieston
2014-02-21 12:24 ` Paul Durrant
2014-02-17 17:57 ` [PATCH V4 net-next 2/5] xen-netback: Add support for multiple queues Andrew J. Bennieston
2014-02-21 12:13 ` Paul Durrant
2014-02-21 12:20 ` Andrew Bennieston
2014-02-21 12:22 ` David Vrabel
2014-02-21 12:24 ` Andrew Bennieston
2014-02-21 13:16 ` David Laight
2014-02-17 17:57 ` [PATCH V4 net-next 3/5] xen-netfront: Factor queue-specific data into queue struct Andrew J. Bennieston
2014-02-17 18:04 ` David Vrabel
2014-02-17 17:57 ` [PATCH V4 net-next 4/5] xen-netfront: Add support for multiple queues Andrew J. Bennieston
2014-02-17 18:04 ` David Vrabel
2014-02-17 17:58 ` [PATCH V4 net-next 5/5] xen-net{back, front}: Document multi-queue feature in netif.h Andrew J. Bennieston
2014-02-17 18:06 ` [PATCH V4 net-next 5/5] xen-net{back,front}: " David Vrabel
2014-02-21 12:22 ` Paul Durrant
2014-02-21 12:24 ` Andrew Bennieston
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1392659880-2538-1-git-send-email-andrew.bennieston@citrix.com \
--to=andrew.bennieston@citrix.com \
--cc=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
--cc=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul.durrant@citrix.com \
--cc=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).