Re: [PATCH net-next] chelsio: Use more current logging style

[Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>]

On Thu, 2014-03-06 at 11:50 +0530, Hariprasad S wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 04, 2014 at 11:36:45 -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Tue, 2014-03-04 at 23:22 +0300, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> > > On 03/04/2014 08:43 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > >> From: Kumar Sanghvi <kumaras@chelsio.com>
> > > >> +		CH_WARN(adap, "SGE idma%u, queue%u, maybe stuck state%u %dsecs"
> > > >> +			" (debug0=%#x, debug11=%#x)\n",
> > > > Probably better with the format coalesced:
> > > > 		CH_WARN(adap, "SGE idma%u, queue%u, maybe stuck state%u %dsecs (debug0=%#x, debug11=%#x)\n",
> > >     Surely better, as otherwise it shouldn't pass scripts/checkpatch.pl.
> > 
> > It'd complain in any case as CH_<LEVEL> macros are 
> > uppercase and checkpatch doesn't know that those are
> > logging uses.
> > 
> > Maybe renaming all the CH_<LEVEL> macros to lower
> > case like this would help.
> > 
> > This also can now use dynamic_debug for the ch_dbg
> > statements and removes the CH_MSG function as it's
> > unused.
> > 
> > From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
> > 
> > Use more standard style lower case logging macros.
> > 
> > Coalesce formats
> > Remove unnecessary periods
> > Enable dynamic debugging and verify debug format/arguments
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
> > ---
> [...] 
> > 
> 
> I don't see this patch in net-next or in the netdev patchwork queue.
> Is the patch lost by any chance? Or I missed something ?

Maybe an ack by someone from Chelsio?

Likely David thought it RFC because of the ongoing
patches from Chelsio with "changes requested".

http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/326462/

It's a trivial bit of code to redo if necessary or
desired after the larger patch set done by you all.

cheers, Joe