From: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
rgb@redhat.com, linux-audit@redhat.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] namespaces fixes for 3.14-rcX
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2014 09:59:04 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1394459944.17193.12.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87bnxesqf0.fsf_-_@xmission.com>
On Sun, 2014-03-09 at 20:06 -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Linus,
>
> Please pull the for-linus branch from the git tree:
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ebiederm/user-namespace.git for-linus
>
> HEAD: d211f177b28ec070c25b3d0b960aa55f352f731f audit: Update kdoc for audit_send_reply and audit_list_rules_send
>
> Starting with 3.14-rc1 the audit code is faulty (think oopses and races)
> with respect to how it computes the network namespace of which socket to
> reply to, and I happened to notice by chance when reading through the
> code.
>
> My efforts to get these fixes noticed by people who care about audit
> seem to have landed on deaf ears, so since these are namespace related I
> have put them in my tree.
This commentary sounds like a pile of crap seeing as how there was a
whole discussion around how to handle this stuff, which you were a part
of. And that the audit tree already picked up these 2 patches.
In any case, since I haven't sent them to Linus and I'm glad that is
done, so feel free to consider this me Acking the pull request.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-10 13:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <8738j3vzry.fsf@xmission.com>
[not found] ` <20140301011142.GK16640@madcap2.tricolour.ca>
[not found] ` <87fvn2r0yb.fsf@xmission.com>
[not found] ` <874n3ir0uw.fsf_-_@xmission.com>
2014-03-01 4:50 ` [RFC][PATCH] audit: Simplify by assuming the callers socket buffer is large enough Eric W. Biederman
2014-03-04 21:30 ` Andrew Morton
2014-03-04 21:51 ` David Miller
2014-03-04 22:41 ` Eric W. Biederman
2014-03-04 22:50 ` Andrew Morton
2014-03-10 3:06 ` [GIT PULL] namespaces fixes for 3.14-rcX Eric W. Biederman
2014-03-10 13:59 ` Eric Paris [this message]
2014-03-10 19:56 ` Eric W. Biederman
2014-03-16 18:36 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2014-03-05 0:21 ` [RFC][PATCH] audit: Simplify by assuming the callers socket buffer is large enough David Miller
2014-03-05 16:59 ` Steve Grubb
2014-03-05 18:06 ` Eric W. Biederman
2014-03-07 22:52 ` Eric Paris
2014-03-08 0:48 ` David Miller
2014-03-08 3:27 ` Steve Grubb
2014-03-08 6:34 ` David Miller
2014-03-08 3:56 ` Eric Paris
2014-03-10 19:30 ` David Miller
2014-03-10 21:57 ` Eric Paris
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1394459944.17193.12.camel@localhost \
--to=eparis@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rgb@redhat.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).