From: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>
To: davem@davemloft.net
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>,
Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>,
James Morris <james.l.morris@oracle.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Subject: [PATCH] seccomp: fix populating a0-a5 syscall args in 32-bit x86 BPF
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2014 21:02:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1397502179-15029-1-git-send-email-dborkman@redhat.com> (raw)
Linus reports that on 32-bit x86 Chromium throws the following seccomp
resp. audit log messages:
audit: type=1326 audit(1397359304.356:28108): auid=500 uid=500
gid=500 ses=2 subj=unconfined_u:unconfined_r:chrome_sandbox_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023
pid=3677 comm="chrome" exe="/opt/google/chrome/chrome" sig=0
syscall=172 compat=0 ip=0xb2dd9852 code=0x30000
audit: type=1326 audit(1397359304.356:28109): auid=500 uid=500
gid=500 ses=2 subj=unconfined_u:unconfined_r:chrome_sandbox_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023
pid=3677 comm="chrome" exe="/opt/google/chrome/chrome" sig=0 syscall=5
compat=0 ip=0xb2dd9852 code=0x50000
These audit messages are being triggered via audit_seccomp() through
__secure_computing() in seccomp mode (BPF) filter with seccomp return
codes 0x30000 (== SECCOMP_RET_TRAP) and 0x50000 (== SECCOMP_RET_ERRNO)
during filter runtime. Moreover, Linus reports that x86_64 Chromium
seems fine.
The underlying issue that explains this is that the implementation of
populate_seccomp_data() is wrong. Our seccomp data structure sd that
is being shared with user ABI is:
struct seccomp_data {
int nr;
__u32 arch;
__u64 instruction_pointer;
__u64 args[6];
};
Therefore, a simple cast to 'unsigned long *' for storing the value of
the syscall argument via syscall_get_arguments() is just wrong as on
32-bit x86 (or any other 32bit arch), it would result in storing a0-a5
at wrong offsets in args[] member, and thus i) could leak stack memory
to user space and ii) tampers with the logic of seccomp BPF programs
that read out and check for syscall arguments:
syscall_get_arguments(task, regs, 0, 1, (unsigned long *) &sd->args[0]);
Tested on 32-bit x86 with Google Chrome, unfortunately only via remote
test machine through slow ssh X forwarding, but it fixes the issue on
my side. So fix it up by storing args in type correct variables, gcc
is clever and optimizes the copy away in other cases, e.g. x86_64.
Fixes: bd4cf0ed331a ("net: filter: rework/optimize internal BPF interpreter's instruction set")
Reported-and-bisected-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
Cc: James Morris <james.l.morris@oracle.com>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
---
Dave, do you want to pick this up?
kernel/seccomp.c | 17 ++++++++---------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/seccomp.c b/kernel/seccomp.c
index d8d046c..590c379 100644
--- a/kernel/seccomp.c
+++ b/kernel/seccomp.c
@@ -69,18 +69,17 @@ static void populate_seccomp_data(struct seccomp_data *sd)
{
struct task_struct *task = current;
struct pt_regs *regs = task_pt_regs(task);
+ unsigned long args[6];
sd->nr = syscall_get_nr(task, regs);
sd->arch = syscall_get_arch();
-
- /* Unroll syscall_get_args to help gcc on arm. */
- syscall_get_arguments(task, regs, 0, 1, (unsigned long *) &sd->args[0]);
- syscall_get_arguments(task, regs, 1, 1, (unsigned long *) &sd->args[1]);
- syscall_get_arguments(task, regs, 2, 1, (unsigned long *) &sd->args[2]);
- syscall_get_arguments(task, regs, 3, 1, (unsigned long *) &sd->args[3]);
- syscall_get_arguments(task, regs, 4, 1, (unsigned long *) &sd->args[4]);
- syscall_get_arguments(task, regs, 5, 1, (unsigned long *) &sd->args[5]);
-
+ syscall_get_arguments(task, regs, 0, 6, args);
+ sd->args[0] = args[0];
+ sd->args[1] = args[1];
+ sd->args[2] = args[2];
+ sd->args[3] = args[3];
+ sd->args[4] = args[4];
+ sd->args[5] = args[5];
sd->instruction_pointer = KSTK_EIP(task);
}
--
1.7.11.7
next reply other threads:[~2014-04-14 19:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-14 19:02 Daniel Borkmann [this message]
2014-04-14 20:13 ` [PATCH] seccomp: fix populating a0-a5 syscall args in 32-bit x86 BPF Andy Lutomirski
2014-04-14 20:24 ` David Miller
2014-04-14 20:28 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-04-15 6:31 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2014-04-15 17:46 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-04-15 22:52 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-04-15 23:17 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1397502179-15029-1-git-send-email-dborkman@redhat.com \
--to=dborkman@redhat.com \
--cc=ast@plumgrid.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eparis@redhat.com \
--cc=james.l.morris@oracle.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).