From: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
stephen@networkplumber.org, Cong Wang <cwang@twopensource.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH net v2] rtnetlink: wait for unregistering devices in rtnl_link_unregister()
Date: Mon, 12 May 2014 15:11:20 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1399932680-31479-1-git-send-email-xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> (raw)
From: Cong Wang <cwang@twopensource.com>
From: Cong Wang <cwang@twopensource.com>
commit 50624c934db18ab90 (net: Delay default_device_exit_batch until no
devices are unregistering) introduced rtnl_lock_unregistering() for
default_device_exit_batch(). Same race could happen we when rmmod a driver
which calls rtnl_link_unregister() as we call dev->destructor without rtnl
lock.
For long term, I think we should clean up the mess of netdev_run_todo()
and net namespce exit code.
Cc: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <cwang@twopensource.com>
---
v2: avoid using macro and hold net_mutex too
include/linux/rtnetlink.h | 5 +++++
net/core/dev.c | 2 +-
net/core/net_namespace.c | 2 +-
net/core/rtnetlink.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
4 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/rtnetlink.h b/include/linux/rtnetlink.h
index 8e3e66a..953937e 100644
--- a/include/linux/rtnetlink.h
+++ b/include/linux/rtnetlink.h
@@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
#include <linux/mutex.h>
#include <linux/netdevice.h>
+#include <linux/wait.h>
#include <uapi/linux/rtnetlink.h>
extern int rtnetlink_send(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net *net, u32 pid, u32 group, int echo);
@@ -22,6 +23,10 @@ extern void rtnl_lock(void);
extern void rtnl_unlock(void);
extern int rtnl_trylock(void);
extern int rtnl_is_locked(void);
+
+extern wait_queue_head_t netdev_unregistering_wq;
+extern struct mutex net_mutex;
+
#ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING
extern int lockdep_rtnl_is_held(void);
#else
diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
index c619b86..6da649b 100644
--- a/net/core/dev.c
+++ b/net/core/dev.c
@@ -5541,7 +5541,7 @@ static int dev_new_index(struct net *net)
/* Delayed registration/unregisteration */
static LIST_HEAD(net_todo_list);
-static DECLARE_WAIT_QUEUE_HEAD(netdev_unregistering_wq);
+DECLARE_WAIT_QUEUE_HEAD(netdev_unregistering_wq);
static void net_set_todo(struct net_device *dev)
{
diff --git a/net/core/net_namespace.c b/net/core/net_namespace.c
index 81d3a9a..7c8ffd9 100644
--- a/net/core/net_namespace.c
+++ b/net/core/net_namespace.c
@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@
static LIST_HEAD(pernet_list);
static struct list_head *first_device = &pernet_list;
-static DEFINE_MUTEX(net_mutex);
+DEFINE_MUTEX(net_mutex);
LIST_HEAD(net_namespace_list);
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(net_namespace_list);
diff --git a/net/core/rtnetlink.c b/net/core/rtnetlink.c
index 9837beb..2d8d8fc 100644
--- a/net/core/rtnetlink.c
+++ b/net/core/rtnetlink.c
@@ -353,15 +353,46 @@ void __rtnl_link_unregister(struct rtnl_link_ops *ops)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__rtnl_link_unregister);
+/* Return with the rtnl_lock held when there are no network
+ * devices unregistering in any network namespace.
+ */
+static void rtnl_lock_unregistering_all(void)
+{
+ struct net *net;
+ bool unregistering;
+ DEFINE_WAIT(wait);
+
+ for (;;) {
+ prepare_to_wait(&netdev_unregistering_wq, &wait,
+ TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
+ unregistering = false;
+ rtnl_lock();
+ for_each_net(net) {
+ if (net->dev_unreg_count > 0) {
+ unregistering = true;
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+ if (!unregistering)
+ break;
+ __rtnl_unlock();
+ schedule();
+ }
+ finish_wait(&netdev_unregistering_wq, &wait);
+}
+
/**
* rtnl_link_unregister - Unregister rtnl_link_ops from rtnetlink.
* @ops: struct rtnl_link_ops * to unregister
*/
void rtnl_link_unregister(struct rtnl_link_ops *ops)
{
- rtnl_lock();
+ /* Close the race with cleanup_net() */
+ mutex_lock(&net_mutex);
+ rtnl_lock_unregistering_all();
__rtnl_link_unregister(ops);
rtnl_unlock();
+ mutex_unlock(&net_mutex);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rtnl_link_unregister);
next reply other threads:[~2014-05-12 22:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-12 22:11 Cong Wang [this message]
2014-05-15 18:32 ` [PATCH net v2] rtnetlink: wait for unregistering devices in rtnl_link_unregister() David Miller
2014-05-15 18:43 ` Cong Wang
2014-05-15 18:50 ` David Miller
2014-05-15 19:31 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1399932680-31479-1-git-send-email-xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
--to=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
--cc=cwang@twopensource.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).