From: Octavian Purdila <octavian.purdila@intel.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Octavian Purdila <octavian.purdila@intel.com>
Subject: [net-next v2 07/13] tcp: move around a few calls in tcp_v6_conn_request
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 17:09:56 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1403705402-14388-8-git-send-email-octavian.purdila@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1403705402-14388-1-git-send-email-octavian.purdila@intel.com>
Make the tcp_v6_conn_request calls flow similar with that of
tcp_v4_conn_request.
Note that want_cookie can be true only if isn is zero and that is why
we can move the if (want_cookie) block out of the if (!isn) block.
Moving security_inet_conn_request() has a couple of side effects:
missing inet_rsk(req)->ecn_ok update and the req->cookie_ts
update. However, neither SELinux nor Smack security hooks seems to
check them. This change should also avoid future different behaviour
for IPv4 and IPv6 in the security hooks.
Signed-off-by: Octavian Purdila <octavian.purdila@intel.com>
---
net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c | 18 +++++++-----------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c b/net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c
index d780d88..91b8a2e 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c
@@ -1070,16 +1070,16 @@ static int tcp_v6_conn_request(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
ireq = inet_rsk(req);
af_ops->init_req(req, sk, skb);
+ if (security_inet_conn_request(sk, skb, req))
+ goto drop_and_release;
+
if (!want_cookie || tmp_opt.tstamp_ok)
TCP_ECN_create_request(req, skb, sock_net(sk));
- if (!isn) {
- if (want_cookie) {
- isn = cookie_init_sequence(af_ops, sk, skb, &req->mss);
- req->cookie_ts = tmp_opt.tstamp_ok;
- goto have_isn;
- }
-
+ if (want_cookie) {
+ isn = cookie_init_sequence(af_ops, sk, skb, &req->mss);
+ req->cookie_ts = tmp_opt.tstamp_ok;
+ } else if (!isn) {
/* VJ's idea. We save last timestamp seen
* from the destination in peer table, when entering
* state TIME-WAIT, and check against it before
@@ -1116,10 +1116,6 @@ static int tcp_v6_conn_request(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
isn = tcp_v6_init_sequence(skb);
}
-have_isn:
-
- if (security_inet_conn_request(sk, skb, req))
- goto drop_and_release;
if (!dst) {
dst = af_ops->route_req(sk, (struct flowi *)&fl6, req, NULL);
--
1.8.3.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-25 14:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-25 14:09 [net-next v2 00/13] remove code duplication in tcp_v[46]_conn_request Octavian Purdila
2014-06-25 14:09 ` [net-next v2 01/13] tcp: cookie_v4_init_sequence: skb should be const Octavian Purdila
2014-06-25 14:09 ` [net-next v2 02/13] tcp: tcp_v[46]_conn_request: fix snt_synack initialization Octavian Purdila
2014-06-28 2:16 ` Neal Cardwell
2014-06-28 2:24 ` Neal Cardwell
2014-06-30 11:50 ` Octavian Purdila
2014-06-30 19:11 ` Neal Cardwell
2014-06-30 21:00 ` Octavian Purdila
2014-07-01 2:24 ` Neal Cardwell
2014-06-25 14:09 ` [net-next v2 03/13] net: remove inet6_reqsk_alloc Octavian Purdila
2014-06-25 17:59 ` Cong Wang
2014-06-25 18:04 ` Octavian Purdila
2014-06-25 14:09 ` [net-next v2 04/13] tcp: add init_req method to tcp_request_sock_ops Octavian Purdila
2014-06-25 14:09 ` [net-next v2 05/13] tcp: add init_cookie_seq " Octavian Purdila
2014-06-25 14:09 ` [net-next v2 06/13] tcp: add route_req " Octavian Purdila
2014-06-25 14:09 ` Octavian Purdila [this message]
2014-06-25 14:29 ` [net-next v2 07/13] tcp: move around a few calls in tcp_v6_conn_request Paul Moore
2014-06-25 14:09 ` [net-next v2 08/13] tcp: add init_seq method to tcp_request_sock_ops Octavian Purdila
2014-06-25 14:09 ` [net-next v2 09/13] tcp: add send_synack " Octavian Purdila
2014-06-25 14:09 ` [net-next v2 10/13] tcp: unify tcp_v4_rtx_synack and tcp_v6_rtx_synack Octavian Purdila
2014-06-25 14:10 ` [net-next v2 11/13] tcp: add mss_clamp to tcp_request_sock_ops Octavian Purdila
2014-06-25 14:10 ` [net-next v2 12/13] tcp: add queue_add_hash " Octavian Purdila
2014-06-25 19:05 ` Cong Wang
2014-06-25 14:10 ` [net-next v2 13/13] tcp: add tcp_conn_request Octavian Purdila
2014-06-27 22:54 ` [net-next v2 00/13] remove code duplication in tcp_v[46]_conn_request David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1403705402-14388-8-git-send-email-octavian.purdila@intel.com \
--to=octavian.purdila@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).