From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from dvalin.narfation.org (dvalin.narfation.org [213.160.73.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D89F21A0728 for ; Sun, 3 May 2026 08:05:53 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=213.160.73.56 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1777795555; cv=none; b=mW3NGRabE1VLIFETturx960KKFIYgvdss7+7M03qMd13a2yG57t/gq8cYekWRg3y0xIjEQX6fK05nNjMZHPpCogvLkNKzmmXgDiNmXE6zTN/WJi8ANAyQrr47sJwHC8aVoqJS11ZNbjniETuEWXH4dbQmIFq0X+xZiKvxbo6xNc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1777795555; c=relaxed/simple; bh=RLn6LaS3lmKnOXrMG0ofTgWnb/aqfSMFC4zyPClEBBI=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Uut6sRDOKpAVTAo/M+K1P4jfaRYE9yNVHlX+Fwk4SE+7lzG9DmJylyq/8W1ElbNmi6P4pmSthsu2Y78R9gMvLeKdeIXy5xoYwqi/QZICvRrJ4/n6a88ICQgiByEcSHtzVr5OPT86SwHU8WkwNo3FJstXxbLx+dv9eZbYcmdWfnI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=narfation.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=narfation.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=narfation.org header.i=@narfation.org header.b=zzq5e9Ka; arc=none smtp.client-ip=213.160.73.56 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=narfation.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=narfation.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=narfation.org header.i=@narfation.org header.b="zzq5e9Ka" Received: by dvalin.narfation.org (Postfix) id 7A05D1FF83; Sun, 03 May 2026 08:05:45 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=narfation.org; s=20121; t=1777795545; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=fzR8+k31T3dyo0vuNU9VsFopPI5PjBRJUMzt+T9FZaY=; b=zzq5e9Kap5VbFyzDbR2iwLtVyyJDPfdZepaW/Wx/mfpcMuskYQmaD41D0ch77+ZOgR8kU8 xk5ER8I3cjMMw/UvFB2FKL2q2fwtM/HjoPt9CClwVLeCD61krsezhMCuXpSBdK1wwlRajd XMkwBCFqD9CwQjzoqaJTMvNCPXYeT2U= From: Sven Eckelmann To: Ren Wei , Simon Horman Cc: b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, marek.lindner@mailbox.org, sw@simonwunderlich.de, antonio@mandelbit.com, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, yuantan098@gmail.com, yifanwucs@gmail.com, tomapufckgml@gmail.com, bird@lzu.edu.cn, tr0jan@lzu.edu.cn, wangjiexun2025@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2 1/2] batman-adv: reject new tp_meter sessions during teardown Date: Sun, 03 May 2026 10:05:35 +0200 Message-ID: <14078459.uLZWGnKmhe@sven-desktop> In-Reply-To: <20260428183028.GW900403@horms.kernel.org> References: <20260427064338.1526762-1-n05ec@lzu.edu.cn> <20260428183028.GW900403@horms.kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart3119035.e9J7NaK4W3"; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" --nextPart3119035.e9J7NaK4W3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; protected-headers="v1" From: Sven Eckelmann To: Ren Wei , Simon Horman Date: Sun, 03 May 2026 10:05:35 +0200 Message-ID: <14078459.uLZWGnKmhe@sven-desktop> In-Reply-To: <20260428183028.GW900403@horms.kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 On Tuesday, 28 April 2026 20:30:28 CEST Simon Horman wrote: [...] > Hi Ren, > > An AI generated review of this patch-set is available on sashiko.dev. > Could you take a look over that. I expect that some follow-up patches > are warranted. > I have some question regarding sashiko.dev - not sure if you can answer this. When I get a patch for review (the the newest one from Ren), sashiko marked it as "Embargoed" and I can't see it in b4. I have no idea why this is the case and I am unsure what I should do in this case: * ignore sashiko * wait until sashiko lifts the embargo * ... Maybe there is some document which explains it further and you can just point me in the right direction. And just a question from Simon: sashiko.dev is meant as read-only platform, right? So, no way to write a rebuttal for wrong statements, correct? Regards, Sven --nextPart3119035.e9J7NaK4W3 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEABYKAB0WIQS81G/PswftH/OW8cVND3cr0xT1ywUCafcBzwAKCRBND3cr0xT1 yzy+AQCoHOxLYLXLW0CXpJXmp1UT5lwOd0umbXwMfALvhQEMWgEAkzoJrWTyqcGR 9O17fKZCPmU79ZR4xkK2e2USU5n/9AQ= =MBZ2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart3119035.e9J7NaK4W3--