From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Oliver Neukum Subject: Re: [PATCH] cdc-ether: clean packet filter upon probe Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2014 10:07:43 +0200 Message-ID: <1408954063.10300.1.camel@linux-fkkt.site> References: <1406537796-20156-1-git-send-email-oneukum@suse.de> <87a977z5pn.fsf@nemi.mork.no> <1408083121.17565.4.camel@linux-fkkt.site> <87d2c2xm2k.fsf@nemi.mork.no> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Bj=F8rn?= Mork Return-path: Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:35726 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753053AbaHYIHq (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Aug 2014 04:07:46 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87d2c2xm2k.fsf@nemi.mork.no> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, 2014-08-15 at 09:13 +0200, Bj=C3=B8rn Mork wrote: > Oliver Neukum writes: >=20 > > On Thu, 2014-08-14 at 13:11 +0200, Bj=C3=B8rn Mork wrote: > > Support for this request is mandatory. >=20 > Yes, there is no problem for standard conforming ECM devices. I full= y > agree there.=20 >=20 > But standard conformance is unfortunately not something we can expect= =2E > My question was regarding the non-conforming devices, like the ones > supported by th zaurus and rndis_host drivers. These drivers are mad= e You have a point. Yet another flag? Do you see an alternative? Regards Oliver