From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hannes Frederic Sowa Subject: Re: [RFC] net: ipv4: drop unicast encapsulated in L2 multicast Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2014 09:38:34 +0200 Message-ID: <1409125114.11976.14.camel@localhost> References: <1408641747-22199-1-git-send-email-johannes@sipsolutions.net> (sfid-20140821_192515_304437_37E734D5) <1408642331.4388.2.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linux-wireless-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Johannes Berg Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1408642331.4388.2.camel-8Nb76shvtaUJvtFkdXX2HixXY32XiHfO@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-wireless-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Hi Johannes, On Do, 2014-08-21 at 19:32 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Thu, 2014-08-21 at 19:22 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > > From: Johannes Berg > > > > RFC 1122 says that unicast packets encapsulated in broadcast > > link-layer packets should be dropped. Implement that, but also > > extend it to link-layer multicast packets. > > I cannot find anything equivalent in the IPv6 RFCs - anyone more > familiar with that who could help check for that? > > And if it's *not* in the IPv6 RFCs, how should we implement this? I haven't found anything, too. Should I bring this up with IETF? Bye, Hannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html