From: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>
To: davem@davemloft.net
Cc: ast@plumgrid.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 3/3] net: bpf: be friendly to kmemcheck
Date: Sat, 6 Sep 2014 11:42:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1409996567-2170-4-git-send-email-dborkman@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1409996567-2170-1-git-send-email-dborkman@redhat.com>
Reported by Mikulas Patocka, kmemcheck currently barks out a
false positive since we don't have special kmemcheck annotation
for bitfields used in bpf_prog structure.
We currently have jited:1, len:31 and thus when accessing len
while CONFIG_KMEMCHECK enabled, kmemcheck throws a warning that
we're reading uninitialized memory.
As we don't need the whole bit universe for pages member, we
can just split it to u16 and use a bool flag for jited instead
of a bitfield.
Signed-off-by: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
---
arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c | 2 +-
arch/mips/net/bpf_jit.c | 2 +-
arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 2 +-
arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 2 +-
arch/sparc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 2 +-
arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 2 +-
include/linux/filter.h | 6 +++---
net/core/filter.c | 2 +-
8 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c b/arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c
index 2d1a5b9..6b45f64 100644
--- a/arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c
+++ b/arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c
@@ -933,7 +933,7 @@ void bpf_jit_compile(struct bpf_prog *fp)
set_memory_ro((unsigned long)header, header->pages);
fp->bpf_func = (void *)ctx.target;
- fp->jited = 1;
+ fp->jited = true;
out:
kfree(ctx.offsets);
return;
diff --git a/arch/mips/net/bpf_jit.c b/arch/mips/net/bpf_jit.c
index cfa83cf..0e97ccd 100644
--- a/arch/mips/net/bpf_jit.c
+++ b/arch/mips/net/bpf_jit.c
@@ -1417,7 +1417,7 @@ void bpf_jit_compile(struct bpf_prog *fp)
bpf_jit_dump(fp->len, alloc_size, 2, ctx.target);
fp->bpf_func = (void *)ctx.target;
- fp->jited = 1;
+ fp->jited = true;
out:
kfree(ctx.offsets);
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
index 40c53ff..cbae2df 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
@@ -686,7 +686,7 @@ void bpf_jit_compile(struct bpf_prog *fp)
((u64 *)image)[0] = (u64)code_base;
((u64 *)image)[1] = local_paca->kernel_toc;
fp->bpf_func = (void *)image;
- fp->jited = 1;
+ fp->jited = true;
}
out:
kfree(addrs);
diff --git a/arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
index b734f97..555f5c7 100644
--- a/arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
+++ b/arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
@@ -842,7 +842,7 @@ void bpf_jit_compile(struct bpf_prog *fp)
if (jit.start) {
set_memory_ro((unsigned long)header, header->pages);
fp->bpf_func = (void *) jit.start;
- fp->jited = 1;
+ fp->jited = true;
}
out:
kfree(addrs);
diff --git a/arch/sparc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/sparc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
index f7a736b..b2ad9dc 100644
--- a/arch/sparc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
+++ b/arch/sparc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
@@ -801,7 +801,7 @@ cond_branch: f_offset = addrs[i + filter[i].jf];
if (image) {
bpf_flush_icache(image, image + proglen);
fp->bpf_func = (void *)image;
- fp->jited = 1;
+ fp->jited = true;
}
out:
kfree(addrs);
diff --git a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
index 9de0b54..d56cd1f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
+++ b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
@@ -955,7 +955,7 @@ void bpf_int_jit_compile(struct bpf_prog *prog)
bpf_flush_icache(header, image + proglen);
set_memory_ro((unsigned long)header, header->pages);
prog->bpf_func = (void *)image;
- prog->jited = 1;
+ prog->jited = true;
}
out:
kfree(addrs);
diff --git a/include/linux/filter.h b/include/linux/filter.h
index 868764f..4b59ede 100644
--- a/include/linux/filter.h
+++ b/include/linux/filter.h
@@ -300,9 +300,9 @@ struct bpf_work_struct {
};
struct bpf_prog {
- u32 pages; /* Number of allocated pages */
- u32 jited:1, /* Is our filter JIT'ed? */
- len:31; /* Number of filter blocks */
+ u16 pages; /* Number of allocated pages */
+ bool jited; /* Is our filter JIT'ed? */
+ u32 len; /* Number of filter blocks */
struct sock_fprog_kern *orig_prog; /* Original BPF program */
struct bpf_work_struct *work; /* Deferred free work struct */
unsigned int (*bpf_func)(const struct sk_buff *skb,
diff --git a/net/core/filter.c b/net/core/filter.c
index fa5b7d0..dfc716f 100644
--- a/net/core/filter.c
+++ b/net/core/filter.c
@@ -972,7 +972,7 @@ static struct bpf_prog *bpf_prepare_filter(struct bpf_prog *fp)
int err;
fp->bpf_func = NULL;
- fp->jited = 0;
+ fp->jited = false;
err = bpf_check_classic(fp->insns, fp->len);
if (err) {
--
1.7.11.7
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-06 9:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-06 9:42 [PATCH net-next 0/3] BPF updates Daniel Borkmann
2014-09-06 9:42 ` [PATCH net-next 1/3] net: bpf: consolidate JIT binary allocator Daniel Borkmann
2014-09-07 23:15 ` David Miller
2014-09-08 0:17 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2014-09-08 6:09 ` Daniel Borkmann
2014-09-08 6:17 ` Heiko Carstens
2014-09-08 8:12 ` Daniel Borkmann
2014-09-06 9:42 ` [PATCH net-next 2/3] net: bpf: arm: address randomize and write protect JIT code Daniel Borkmann
2014-09-06 17:36 ` Mircea Gherzan
2014-09-06 9:42 ` Daniel Borkmann [this message]
2014-09-06 16:09 ` [PATCH net-next 3/3] net: bpf: be friendly to kmemcheck Alexei Starovoitov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1409996567-2170-4-git-send-email-dborkman@redhat.com \
--to=dborkman@redhat.com \
--cc=ast@plumgrid.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=mpatocka@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).