From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Berg Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] zd1211rw: replace ZD_ASSERT with lockdep_assert_held() Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 12:42:19 +0200 Message-ID: <1410432139.22863.10.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> References: <1410418407.1825.0.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> <1410430179-19944-1-git-send-email-sanjeev_sharma@mentor.com> (sfid-20140911_121019_335368_163BEA7C) <1410430345.22863.0.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "dsd@gentoo.org" , "kune@deine-taler.de" , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" To: "Sharma, Sanjeev" Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2014-09-11 at 10:36 +0000, Sharma, Sanjeev wrote: > > - ZD_ASSERT(!spin_is_locked(&mac->lock)); > > + lockdep_assert_held(&mac->lock); > >Look closely at this again. > > I didn't understand where I put wrong logic ? Ok, that's fine. But please send a new patch only when you've understood the logic. johannes