From: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@redhat.com>
To: David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>,
Zhi Yong Wu <wuzhy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
Tom Herbert <therbert@google.com>,
Masatake YAMATO <yamato@redhat.com>, Xi Wang <xii@google.com>,
stephen hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tun: make sure interface usage can not overflow
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 14:03:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1412078639.7155.30.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <063D6719AE5E284EB5DD2968C1650D6D174A0ECF@AcuExch.aculab.com>
On Di, 2014-09-30 at 11:18 +0000, David Laight wrote:
> From: Hannes Frederic
> > On Di, 2014-09-30 at 08:20 +0000, David Laight wrote:
> > > From: Hannes Frederic
> > > > On Mo, 2014-09-29 at 12:41 -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> > > > > On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 4:04 AM, David Laight <David.Laight@aculab.com> wrote:
> > > > > > From: Kees Cook
> > > > > >> This makes the size argument a const, since it is always populated by
> > > > > >> the caller.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > There is almost no point making parameters 'const.
> > > > > > ('const foo *' makes sense).
> > > > > >
> > > > > >> Additionally double-checks to make sure the copy_from_user
> > > > > >> can never overflow, keeping CONFIG_DEBUG_STRICT_USER_COPY_CHECKS happy:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> In function 'copy_from_user',
> > > > > >> inlined from '__tun_chr_ioctl' at drivers/net/tun.c:1871:7:
> > > > > >> ... copy_from_user() buffer size is not provably correct
> > > > > >
> > > > > > If 'ifreq_len' could be too big then you want to error the ioctl, not panic.
> > > > > > If it can't be too big you don't need the check.
> > > > >
> > > > > The ifreq_len comes from the callers, and is the output of "sizeof"
> > > > > which is const. Changing the function parameter to "const" means any
> > > > > changes made in the future where the incoming value isn't const, the
> > > > > compiler will throw a warning.
> > > >
> > > > Hmmm, I think you want something like BUILD_BUG_ON(!
> > > > __builtin_constant_p(var)). const in function argument only ensures that
> > > > the value cannot be modified in the function.
> > >
> > > You'd have to do something in the header file - nothing in the function
> > > body can do that check.
> >
> > Sure, it should work. You only need to make sure that gcc inlines the
> > function, so the value is constant (it is not enough that gcc knows the
> > value range, one specific constant is needed). So the simplest fix for
> > this is to specify __tun_chr_ioctl as __always_inline. ;)
>
> You are joking aren't you???
It would propagate the value from the compat and non-compat helper
functions to __tun_chr_ioctl and the __builtin_constant_p checks would
be true in the inlined copy_from/to_user, so no, I was not joking, but
because of my smiley I didn't considered this fix seriously.
> Look at the code.
I did.
> I'd suggest fixing whatever implements CONFIG_DEBUG_STRICT_USER_COPY_CHECKS
> to be less picky.
This might involve gcc changes. E.g. on my gcc I don't get any errors.
But by looking at the code it might be plausible wrong estimations are
being made.
But somehow I really cannot follow the original bug report. Looks like
Kees' __builtin_object_size is broken?
I also checked my tun.i file, I really use gcc __builtin_object_size.
Strange...
Bye,
Hannes
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-30 12:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-28 23:27 [PATCH] tun: make sure interface usage can not overflow Kees Cook
2014-09-29 11:04 ` David Laight
2014-09-29 19:41 ` Kees Cook
2014-09-29 20:04 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2014-09-30 8:20 ` David Laight
2014-09-30 11:03 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2014-09-30 11:18 ` David Laight
2014-09-30 12:03 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa [this message]
2014-09-29 11:48 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-09-29 12:02 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-09-29 19:48 ` Kees Cook
2014-09-30 11:29 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1412078639.7155.30.camel@localhost \
--to=hannes@redhat.com \
--cc=David.Laight@ACULAB.COM \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=therbert@google.com \
--cc=wuzhy@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=xii@google.com \
--cc=yamato@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).