* IPv6 UFO for VMs
@ 2014-10-21 23:44 Ben Hutchings
2014-10-22 9:35 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Ben Hutchings @ 2014-10-21 23:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netdev; +Cc: Hannes Frederic Sowa, virtualization
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1303 bytes --]
There are several ways that VMs can take advantage of UFO and get the
host to do fragmentation for them:
drivers/net/macvtap.c: gso_type = SKB_GSO_UDP;
drivers/net/tun.c: skb_shinfo(skb)->gso_type = SKB_GSO_UDP;
drivers/net/virtio_net.c: skb_shinfo(skb)->gso_type = SKB_GSO_UDP;
Our implementation of UFO for IPv6 does:
fptr = (struct frag_hdr *)(skb_network_header(skb) + unfrag_ip6hlen);
fptr->nexthdr = nexthdr;
fptr->reserved = 0;
fptr->identification = skb_shinfo(skb)->ip6_frag_id;
which assumes ip6_frag_id has been set. That's only true if the local
stack constructed the skb; otherwise it appears we get zero.
This seems to be a regression as a result of:
commit 916e4cf46d0204806c062c8c6c4d1f633852c5b6
Author: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org>
Date: Fri Feb 21 02:55:35 2014 +0100
ipv6: reuse ip6_frag_id from ip6_ufo_append_data
However, that change seems reasonable - we *shouldn't* be choosing IDs
for any other stack. Any paravirt net driver that can use IPv6 UFO
needs to have some way of passing a fragmentation ID to put in
skb_shared_info::ip6_frag_id.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
For every action, there is an equal and opposite criticism. - Harrison
[-- Attachment #1.2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 811 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 183 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: IPv6 UFO for VMs
2014-10-21 23:44 IPv6 UFO for VMs Ben Hutchings
@ 2014-10-22 9:35 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2014-10-27 3:21 ` Ben Hutchings
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Hannes Frederic Sowa @ 2014-10-22 9:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ben Hutchings; +Cc: netdev, virtualization
On Mi, 2014-10-22 at 00:44 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> There are several ways that VMs can take advantage of UFO and get the
> host to do fragmentation for them:
>
> drivers/net/macvtap.c: gso_type = SKB_GSO_UDP;
> drivers/net/tun.c: skb_shinfo(skb)->gso_type = SKB_GSO_UDP;
> drivers/net/virtio_net.c: skb_shinfo(skb)->gso_type = SKB_GSO_UDP;
>
> Our implementation of UFO for IPv6 does:
>
> fptr = (struct frag_hdr *)(skb_network_header(skb) + unfrag_ip6hlen);
> fptr->nexthdr = nexthdr;
> fptr->reserved = 0;
> fptr->identification = skb_shinfo(skb)->ip6_frag_id;
>
> which assumes ip6_frag_id has been set. That's only true if the local
> stack constructed the skb; otherwise it appears we get zero.
>
> This seems to be a regression as a result of:
>
> commit 916e4cf46d0204806c062c8c6c4d1f633852c5b6
> Author: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org>
> Date: Fri Feb 21 02:55:35 2014 +0100
>
> ipv6: reuse ip6_frag_id from ip6_ufo_append_data
>
> However, that change seems reasonable - we *shouldn't* be choosing IDs
> for any other stack. Any paravirt net driver that can use IPv6 UFO
> needs to have some way of passing a fragmentation ID to put in
> skb_shared_info::ip6_frag_id.
Do we really gain a lot of performance by enabling UFO on those devices
or would it make sense to just drop support? It only helps fragmenting
large UDP packets, so I don't think it is worth it.
Otherwise I agree with Ben, we need to pass a fragmentation id from the
host over to the system segmenting the gso frame. Fragmentation ids must
be generated by the end system.
Hmm...
Bye,
Hannes
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: IPv6 UFO for VMs
2014-10-22 9:35 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
@ 2014-10-27 3:21 ` Ben Hutchings
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Ben Hutchings @ 2014-10-27 3:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Hannes Frederic Sowa; +Cc: netdev, virtualization
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2173 bytes --]
On Wed, 2014-10-22 at 11:35 +0200, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
> On Mi, 2014-10-22 at 00:44 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > There are several ways that VMs can take advantage of UFO and get the
> > host to do fragmentation for them:
> >
> > drivers/net/macvtap.c: gso_type = SKB_GSO_UDP;
> > drivers/net/tun.c: skb_shinfo(skb)->gso_type = SKB_GSO_UDP;
> > drivers/net/virtio_net.c: skb_shinfo(skb)->gso_type = SKB_GSO_UDP;
> >
> > Our implementation of UFO for IPv6 does:
> >
> > fptr = (struct frag_hdr *)(skb_network_header(skb) + unfrag_ip6hlen);
> > fptr->nexthdr = nexthdr;
> > fptr->reserved = 0;
> > fptr->identification = skb_shinfo(skb)->ip6_frag_id;
> >
> > which assumes ip6_frag_id has been set. That's only true if the local
> > stack constructed the skb; otherwise it appears we get zero.
> >
> > This seems to be a regression as a result of:
> >
> > commit 916e4cf46d0204806c062c8c6c4d1f633852c5b6
> > Author: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org>
> > Date: Fri Feb 21 02:55:35 2014 +0100
> >
> > ipv6: reuse ip6_frag_id from ip6_ufo_append_data
> >
> > However, that change seems reasonable - we *shouldn't* be choosing IDs
> > for any other stack. Any paravirt net driver that can use IPv6 UFO
> > needs to have some way of passing a fragmentation ID to put in
> > skb_shared_info::ip6_frag_id.
>
> Do we really gain a lot of performance by enabling UFO on those devices
> or would it make sense to just drop support? It only helps fragmenting
> large UDP packets, so I don't think it is worth it.
It's not been important enough for anyone to bother implementing it in
hardware/firmware aside from Neterion.
I'll shortly post patches to disable it.
Ben.
> Otherwise I agree with Ben, we need to pass a fragmentation id from the
> host over to the system segmenting the gso frame. Fragmentation ids must
> be generated by the end system.
>
> Hmm...
--
Ben Hutchings
Theory and practice are closer in theory than in practice.
- John Levine, moderator of comp.compilers
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 811 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-10-27 3:22 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-10-21 23:44 IPv6 UFO for VMs Ben Hutchings
2014-10-22 9:35 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2014-10-27 3:21 ` Ben Hutchings
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).