From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Maxime Bizon Subject: Re: DMA allocations from CMA and fatal_signal_pending check Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2014 22:07:10 +0100 Message-ID: <1414789630.14835.49.camel@sakura.staff.proxad.net> References: <544FE9BE.6040503@gmail.com> <20141031082818.GB14642@js1304-P5Q-DELUXE> Reply-To: mbizon@freebox.fr Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Florian Fainelli , lauraa@codeaurora.org, "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mina86@mina86.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com, Gregory Fong , gioh.kim@lge.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, Brian Norris , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, m.szyprowski@samsung.com To: Joonsoo Kim Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20141031082818.GB14642@js1304-P5Q-DELUXE> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2014-10-31 at 17:28 +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote: > I guess that it is okay that bcm_sysport_open() return -EINTR? actually, since CMA alloc is hidden behind dma_alloc_coherent(), all you get back is NULL and then return ENOMEM. -- Maxime -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org