From: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: <david.vrabel@citrix.com>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
<xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>, <wei.liu2@citrix.com>,
<malcolm.crossley@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv1 net-next] xen-netback: remove unconditional pull_skb_tail in guest Tx path
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2014 09:53:05 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1415181185.11486.65.camel@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141104.164113.2265592775058059992.davem@davemloft.net>
On Tue, 2014-11-04 at 16:41 -0500, David Miller wrote:
> From: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
> Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2014 17:23:51 +0000
>
> > From: Malcolm Crossley <malcolm.crossley@citrix.com>
> >
> > Unconditionally pulling 128 bytes into the linear buffer is not
> > required. Netback has already grant copied up-to 128 bytes from the
> > first slot of a packet into the linear buffer. The first slot normally
> > contain all the IPv4/IPv6 and TCP/UDP headers.
> >
> > The unconditional pull would often copy frag data unnecessarily. This
> > is a performance problem when running on a version of Xen where grant
> > unmap avoids TLB flushes for pages which are not accessed. TLB
> > flushes can now be avoided for > 99% of unmaps (it was 0% before).
> >
> > Grant unmap TLB flush avoidance will be available in a future version
> > of Xen (probably 4.6).
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Malcolm Crossley <malcolm.crossley@citrix.com>
> > Signed-off-by: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
>
> Now that this has been discussed a bit, it is possible to get an ack or two?
I'd like to see the commit message expanded to explain why this isn't
introducing a (security) bug by not pulling enough stuff into the header
(IOW the conclusion of the discussion).
Ian.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-11-05 9:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-11-03 17:23 [PATCHv1 net-next] xen-netback: remove unconditional pull_skb_tail in guest Tx path David Vrabel
2014-11-03 17:39 ` Ian Campbell
2014-11-03 17:46 ` David Vrabel
2014-11-03 17:55 ` Ian Campbell
2014-11-03 18:23 ` [Xen-devel] " Zoltan Kiss
2014-11-04 21:17 ` David Miller
2014-11-04 21:43 ` Eric Dumazet
2014-11-05 10:46 ` David Vrabel
2014-11-05 10:53 ` Ian Campbell
2014-11-05 9:51 ` Ian Campbell
2014-11-05 17:15 ` David Miller
2014-11-04 21:41 ` David Miller
2014-11-05 9:53 ` Ian Campbell [this message]
2014-11-05 17:16 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1415181185.11486.65.camel@citrix.com \
--to=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
--cc=malcolm.crossley@citrix.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).