From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Joe Perches Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] net-PPP: Replacement of a printk() call by pr_warn() in mppe_rekey() Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2014 14:45:01 -0800 Message-ID: <1417733101.2721.20.camel@perches.com> References: <5307CAA2.8060406@users.sourceforge.net> <530A72AA.3000601@users.sourceforge.net> <530B5FB6.6010207@users.sourceforge.net> <530C5E18.1020800@users.sourceforge.net> <530CD2C4.4050903@users.sourceforge.net> <530CF8FF.8080600@users.sourceforge.net> <530DD06F.4090703@users.sourceforge.net> <5317A59D.4@users.sourceforge.net> <547B4886.4080406@users.sourceforge.net> <547B496E.604@users.sourceforge.net> <547C5CBC.6060607@cogentembedded.com> <547C82A6.2030808@users.sourceforge.net> <547CA157.1080401@cogentembedded.com> <5480DA32.8000201@users.sourceforge.net> <5480DBDE.7040604@users.sourceforge.net> <1417731809.2721.17.camel@perches.com> <5480DFB5.4090708@users.sourceforge.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Sergei Shtylyov , Paul Mackerras , linux-ppp@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Eric Dumazet , LKML , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, Julia Lawall To: SF Markus Elfring Return-path: In-Reply-To: <5480DFB5.4090708@users.sourceforge.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2014-12-04 at 23:27 +0100, SF Markus Elfring wrote: > >> diff --git a/drivers/net/ppp/ppp_mppe.c b/drivers/net/ppp/ppp_mppe.c > > [] > >> @@ -172,9 +172,8 @@ static void mppe_rekey(struct ppp_mppe_state * state, int initial_key) > >> setup_sg(sg_in, state->sha1_digest, state->keylen); > >> setup_sg(sg_out, state->session_key, state->keylen); > >> if (crypto_blkcipher_encrypt(&desc, sg_out, sg_in, > >> - state->keylen) != 0) { > >> - printk(KERN_WARNING "mppe_rekey: cipher_encrypt failed\n"); > >> - } > >> + state->keylen) != 0) > >> + pr_warn("mppe_rekey: cipher_encrypt failed\n"); > > > > It's generally nicer to replace embedded function names > > with "%s: ", __func__ > > > > pr_warn("%s: cipher_encrypt failed\n", __func__); > > Do you want that I send a third patch series for the fine-tuning of these parameters? If you want. I just wanted you to be aware of it for future patches.