From: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org>
To: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>,
"davem@davemloft.net" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/4] net: allow setting congctl via routing table
Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2014 19:35:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1417804540.2462.4.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw46b5hCFPAwziyTRpTAzLdXeb4nrTEZXiEqxYWhRi49CA@mail.gmail.com>
On Fr, 2014-12-05 at 08:35 -0800, Dave Taht wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 7:24 AM, Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com> wrote:
> > This is the second part of our work and allows for setting the congestion
> > control algorithm via routing table. For details, please see individual
> > patches.
> >
> > Joint work with Florian Westphal, suggested by Hannes Frederic Sowa.
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > Daniel Borkmann (4):
> > net: tcp: refactor reinitialization of congestion control
> > net: tcp: add key management to congestion control
> > net: tcp: add RTAX_CC_ALGO fib handling
> > net: tcp: add per route congestion control
>
>
> Very interesting. Have you tried something other than dctcp here
> (e.g. westwood or lp?)
>
> Have you considered the case where the route changes underneath
> you from one device to another?
Notice, there is no way the state of a tcp congestion control algorithm
can be converted to be used by a different one, so this would only
affect new tcp connections via this interface.
> Example, here I am routing everything through eth0, where I
> would want cubic, probably...
>
> root@ganesha:~/git/tinc# ip route
> default via 172.26.16.1 dev eth0 proto babel onlink
> 69.181.216.0/22 via 172.26.16.1 dev eth0 proto babel onlink
> 169.254.0.0/16 dev eth0 scope link metric 1000
> 172.26.16.0/24 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 172.26.16.177
> 172.26.16.1 via 172.26.16.1 dev eth0 proto babel onlink
> 172.26.16.112 via 172.26.16.112 dev eth0 proto babel onlink
> 172.26.17.0/24 via 172.26.16.1 dev eth0 proto babel onlink
> 172.26.17.3 via 172.26.16.1 dev eth0 proto babel onlink
> 172.26.17.227 via 172.26.16.1 dev eth0 proto babel onlink
> 192.168.7.0/30 dev eth1 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.7.1 metric 1
> 192.168.7.2 via 172.26.16.112 dev eth0 proto babel onlink
>
> And I pull the plug, and everything flips over to wlan0,
> where I might want westwood (or something saner than
> that. It might be nice to have a per-device cc default
> algorithm...)
Something like that might be possible with metrics and "via ... dev if0
metric xxx" routes, which will be cleaned up as soon as the interface
goes down and the fallback will be to a route with a different
congestion algorithm.
> root@ganesha:~/git/tinc# ip route
> default via 172.26.17.224 dev wlan0 proto babel onlink
> 69.181.216.0/22 via 172.26.17.224 dev wlan0 proto babel onlink
> 169.254.0.0/16 dev eth0 scope link metric 1000
> 172.26.16.0/24 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 172.26.16.177
> 172.26.16.1 via 172.26.17.227 dev wlan0 proto babel onlink
> 172.26.16.112 via 172.26.17.227 dev wlan0 proto babel onlink
> 172.26.17.0/24 via 172.26.17.224 dev wlan0 proto babel onlink
> 172.26.17.3 via 172.26.17.227 dev wlan0 proto babel onlink
> 172.26.17.227 via 172.26.17.227 dev wlan0 proto babel onlink
> 192.168.7.0/30 dev eth1 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.7.1 metric 1
> 192.168.7.2 via 172.26.17.227 dev wlan0 proto babel onlink
>
Bye,
Hannes
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-12-05 18:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-12-05 15:24 [PATCH net-next 0/4] net: allow setting congctl via routing table Daniel Borkmann
2014-12-05 15:24 ` [PATCH net-next 1/4] net: tcp: refactor reinitialization of congestion control Daniel Borkmann
2014-12-05 15:24 ` [PATCH net-next 2/4] net: tcp: add key management to " Daniel Borkmann
2014-12-05 15:24 ` [PATCH net-next 3/4] net: tcp: add RTAX_CC_ALGO fib handling Daniel Borkmann
2014-12-05 15:24 ` [PATCH net-next 4/4] net: tcp: add per route congestion control Daniel Borkmann
2014-12-05 16:35 ` [PATCH net-next 0/4] net: allow setting congctl via routing table Dave Taht
2014-12-05 18:35 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa [this message]
2014-12-05 19:05 ` Dave Taht
2014-12-05 21:03 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1417804540.2462.4.camel@localhost \
--to=hannes@stressinduktion.org \
--cc=dave.taht@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dborkman@redhat.com \
--cc=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).