From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: James Bottomley Subject: Re: [PATCH net v7 3/7] cxgb4/cxgb4i: set the max. pdu length in firmware Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 23:41:29 +0300 Message-ID: <1418244089.8310.15.camel@HansenPartnership.com> References: <201412102024.sBAKO9eA011525@localhost6.localdomain6> <20141210.153159.617405179156473446.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: kxie@chelsio.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, hariprasad@chelsio.com, anish@chelsio.com, hch@infradead.org, michaelc@cs.wisc.edu To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from bedivere.hansenpartnership.com ([66.63.167.143]:44777 "EHLO bedivere.hansenpartnership.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932116AbaLJUlh (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Dec 2014 15:41:37 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20141210.153159.617405179156473446.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, 2014-12-10 at 15:31 -0500, David Miller wrote: > From: Karen Xie > Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 12:24:09 -0800 > > > [PATCH net v7 3/7] cxgb4/cxgb4i: set the max. pdu length in firmware. > > Please listen to the feedback you have been given. > > Again, you should not duplicate the Subject line in your message > body, that makes more work for the people integrating your patches > as we have to remove all of these things by hand. While we're on the subject of making life easier for maintainers, could I put in a plea for threading your patch set? It really does make it easier to find and apply all the patches, especially on a high traffic list where they otherwise get interspersed with other messages. If you don't use git-send-email, which threads automatically, you can thread manually by just making all the other patches a reply to your [PATCH 0/N], James