From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3/5] netlink: update listeners directly when removing socket
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2014 18:56:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1419270999-22165-4-git-send-email-johannes@sipsolutions.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1419270999-22165-1-git-send-email-johannes@sipsolutions.net>
From: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
The code is now confusing to read - first in one function down
(netlink_remove) any group subscriptions are implicitly removed
by calling __sk_del_bind_node(), but the subscriber database is
only updated far later by calling netlink_update_listeners().
Move the latter call to just after removal from the list so it
is easier to follow the code.
This also enables moving the locking inside the kernel-socket
conditional, which improves the normal socket destruction path.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
---
net/netlink/af_netlink.c | 10 +++++-----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/netlink/af_netlink.c b/net/netlink/af_netlink.c
index 1117a2cc7c28..df6086f69592 100644
--- a/net/netlink/af_netlink.c
+++ b/net/netlink/af_netlink.c
@@ -1111,8 +1111,10 @@ static void netlink_remove(struct sock *sk)
mutex_unlock(&nl_sk_hash_lock);
netlink_table_grab();
- if (nlk_sk(sk)->subscriptions)
+ if (nlk_sk(sk)->subscriptions) {
__sk_del_bind_node(sk);
+ netlink_update_listeners(sk);
+ }
netlink_table_ungrab();
}
@@ -1246,8 +1248,8 @@ static int netlink_release(struct socket *sock)
module_put(nlk->module);
- netlink_table_grab();
if (netlink_is_kernel(sk)) {
+ netlink_table_grab();
BUG_ON(nl_table[sk->sk_protocol].registered == 0);
if (--nl_table[sk->sk_protocol].registered == 0) {
struct listeners *old;
@@ -1261,10 +1263,8 @@ static int netlink_release(struct socket *sock)
nl_table[sk->sk_protocol].flags = 0;
nl_table[sk->sk_protocol].registered = 0;
}
- } else if (nlk->subscriptions) {
- netlink_update_listeners(sk);
+ netlink_table_ungrab();
}
- netlink_table_ungrab();
kfree(nlk->groups);
nlk->groups = NULL;
--
2.1.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-12-22 17:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-12-22 17:56 [PATCH 0/5] netlink/genetlink cleanups & multicast improvements Johannes Berg
2014-12-22 17:56 ` [PATCH 1/5] netlink: rename netlink_unbind() to netlink_undo_bind() Johannes Berg
2014-12-22 17:56 ` [PATCH 2/5] genetlink: pass only network namespace to genl_has_listeners() Johannes Berg
2014-12-22 17:56 ` Johannes Berg [this message]
2014-12-22 17:56 ` [PATCH 4/5] netlink: call unbind when releasing socket Johannes Berg
2014-12-22 17:56 ` [PATCH 5/5] genetlink: pass multicast bind/unbind to families Johannes Berg
2014-12-25 23:26 ` [PATCH 0/5] netlink/genetlink cleanups & multicast improvements David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1419270999-22165-4-git-send-email-johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--to=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=johannes.berg@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox