From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Ahern Subject: Re: Can decnet be deprecated? Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2018 18:35:14 -0700 Message-ID: <141bd0c0-3e4b-8730-a6b2-4c5be7d25138@gmail.com> References: <2c63cb14-ddba-dda3-4ef6-79b31101f162@gmail.com> <20181124.172509.1739636063027441678.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from mail-pl1-f170.google.com ([209.85.214.170]:36913 "EHLO mail-pl1-f170.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726515AbeKYMZG (ORCPT ); Sun, 25 Nov 2018 07:25:06 -0500 Received: by mail-pl1-f170.google.com with SMTP id b5so12200320plr.4 for ; Sat, 24 Nov 2018 17:35:16 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20181124.172509.1739636063027441678.davem@davemloft.net> Content-Language: en-US Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 11/24/18 6:25 PM, David Miller wrote: > From: David Ahern > Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2018 17:12:48 -0700 > >> IPX was moved to staging at the end of last year. Can decnet follow >> suit? git log seems to indicate no active development in a very long time. > > Last time I tried to do that someone immediately said on the list > "Don't, we're using that!" > Ugh, I was afraid of that response. I guess I will have to work around it for the neighbor changes.