From: Ying Xue <ying.xue@windriver.com>
To: <tgraf@suug.ch>
Cc: <davem@davemloft.net>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH net-next v2] rhashtable: unnecessary to use delayed work
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 11:32:50 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1421206370-27977-1-git-send-email-ying.xue@windriver.com> (raw)
When we put our declared work task in the global workqueue with
schedule_delayed_work(), its delay parameter is always zero.
Therefore, we should define a normal work in rhashtable structure
instead of a delayed work.
By the way, we add a condition to check whether resizing functions
are NULL before cancel the work, avoiding to cancel an uninitialized
work.
Lastly, while we wait for all work items we submitted before to run
to completion with cancel_delayed_work(), ht->mutex has been taken in
rhashtable_destroy(). Moreover, cancel_delayed_work() doesn't return
until all work items are accomplished, and when work items are
scheduled, the work's function - rht_deferred_worker() will be called.
However, as rht_deferred_worker() also needs to acquire the lock,
deadlock might happen at the moment as the lock is already held before.
So if the cancel work function is moved out of the lock covered scope,
this can help to avoid the deadlock.
Fixes: 97defe1 ("rhashtable: Per bucket locks & deferred expansion/shrinking")
Signed-off-by: Ying Xue <ying.xue@windriver.com>
Cc: Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch>
---
v2 changes:
Move cancel_work_sync() out of ht->mutex lock scope
include/linux/rhashtable.h | 2 +-
lib/rhashtable.c | 11 +++++------
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/rhashtable.h b/include/linux/rhashtable.h
index 9570832..a2562ed 100644
--- a/include/linux/rhashtable.h
+++ b/include/linux/rhashtable.h
@@ -119,7 +119,7 @@ struct rhashtable {
atomic_t nelems;
atomic_t shift;
struct rhashtable_params p;
- struct delayed_work run_work;
+ struct work_struct run_work;
struct mutex mutex;
bool being_destroyed;
};
diff --git a/lib/rhashtable.c b/lib/rhashtable.c
index ed6ae1a..1f56189 100644
--- a/lib/rhashtable.c
+++ b/lib/rhashtable.c
@@ -476,7 +476,7 @@ static void rht_deferred_worker(struct work_struct *work)
struct rhashtable *ht;
struct bucket_table *tbl;
- ht = container_of(work, struct rhashtable, run_work.work);
+ ht = container_of(work, struct rhashtable, run_work);
mutex_lock(&ht->mutex);
tbl = rht_dereference(ht->tbl, ht);
@@ -498,7 +498,7 @@ static void rhashtable_wakeup_worker(struct rhashtable *ht)
if (tbl == new_tbl &&
((ht->p.grow_decision && ht->p.grow_decision(ht, size)) ||
(ht->p.shrink_decision && ht->p.shrink_decision(ht, size))))
- schedule_delayed_work(&ht->run_work, 0);
+ schedule_work(&ht->run_work);
}
static void __rhashtable_insert(struct rhashtable *ht, struct rhash_head *obj,
@@ -894,7 +894,7 @@ int rhashtable_init(struct rhashtable *ht, struct rhashtable_params *params)
get_random_bytes(&ht->p.hash_rnd, sizeof(ht->p.hash_rnd));
if (ht->p.grow_decision || ht->p.shrink_decision)
- INIT_DEFERRABLE_WORK(&ht->run_work, rht_deferred_worker);
+ INIT_WORK(&ht->run_work, rht_deferred_worker);
return 0;
}
@@ -911,12 +911,11 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rhashtable_init);
void rhashtable_destroy(struct rhashtable *ht)
{
ht->being_destroyed = true;
+ if (ht->p.grow_decision || ht->p.shrink_decision)
+ cancel_work_sync(&ht->run_work);
mutex_lock(&ht->mutex);
-
- cancel_delayed_work(&ht->run_work);
bucket_table_free(rht_dereference(ht->tbl, ht));
-
mutex_unlock(&ht->mutex);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rhashtable_destroy);
--
1.7.9.5
next reply other threads:[~2015-01-14 3:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-14 3:32 Ying Xue [this message]
2015-01-14 9:24 ` [PATCH net-next v2] rhashtable: unnecessary to use delayed work Thomas Graf
2015-01-14 9:29 ` Ying Xue
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1421206370-27977-1-git-send-email-ying.xue@windriver.com \
--to=ying.xue@windriver.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tgraf@suug.ch \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).