From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Dumazet Subject: Re: Re: [bisected regression] e1000e: "Detected Hardware Unit Hang" Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 07:25:32 -0800 Message-ID: <1421335532.11734.73.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com> References: <1719052.SGOfRAJhfQ@storm> <5229621.KczjbIR22Q@storm> <1421333009.11734.53.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com> <8088599.PZmG8U31O2@storm> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: 'Linux Netdev List' , Eric Dumazet , Jeff Kirsher , e1000-devel To: Thomas Jarosch Return-path: Received: from mail-ig0-f172.google.com ([209.85.213.172]:63593 "EHLO mail-ig0-f172.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751676AbbAOPZe (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Jan 2015 10:25:34 -0500 Received: by mail-ig0-f172.google.com with SMTP id l13so15512454iga.5 for ; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 07:25:33 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <8088599.PZmG8U31O2@storm> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, 2015-01-15 at 15:58 +0100, Thomas Jarosch wrote: > A colleague mentioned to me he saw the "Hardware Unit Hang" message every > few days even running on kernel 3.4 (without your patch). Basically I'm > testing now if that's still the case with 3.19-rc4+ or not. > > I'm all for fixing the root cause. I'm just interested if the e1000e > hang can even be triggered when using a max frag page size of 4096. > So far it transferred 751.6 GiB without a hiccup. You told it was forwarding setup. 1) What is the NIC receiving traffic. 2) What happens if you disable GRO on it ?