From: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>
To: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
Cc: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
<xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>,
Jonathan Davies <jonathan.davies@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC PATCHv1 net-next] xen-netback: always fully coalesce guest Rx packets
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 11:23:13 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1421752993.10440.225.camel@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54BD408A.6080405@citrix.com>
On Mon, 2015-01-19 at 17:36 +0000, David Vrabel wrote:
> On 13/01/15 14:30, Wei Liu wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 02:05:17PM +0000, David Vrabel wrote:
> >> Always fully coalesce guest Rx packets into the minimum number of ring
> >> slots. Reducing the number of slots per packet has significant
> >> performance benefits (e.g., 7.2 Gbit/s to 11 Gbit/s in an off-host
> >> receive test).
> >>
> >
> > Good number.
> >
> >> However, this does increase the number of grant ops per packet which
> >> decreases performance with some workloads (intrahost VM to VM)
> >
> > Do you have figures before and after this change?
>
> Some better (more rigorous) results done by Jonathan Davies shows no
> regressions with full coalescing even without the grant copy
> optimization, and a big improvement to single stream receive.
>
> baseline Full coalesce
> Interhost aggregate 24 Gb/s 24 Gb/s
> Interhost VM receive 7.2 Gb/s 11 Gb/s
> Intrahost single stream 14 Gb/s 14 Gb/s
> Intrahost aggregate 34 Gb/s 34 Gb/s
Do you have a third column to hand, for Full-coalesce w/ grant copy
optimisation case? (Don't worry if not)
Ian.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-20 11:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-13 14:05 [RFC PATCHv1 net-next] xen-netback: always fully coalesce guest Rx packets David Vrabel
2015-01-13 14:30 ` Wei Liu
2015-01-19 17:36 ` [Xen-devel] " David Vrabel
2015-01-20 11:21 ` Ian Campbell
2015-01-20 11:23 ` Ian Campbell [this message]
2015-01-20 11:34 ` Ian Campbell
2015-01-20 11:38 ` David Vrabel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1421752993.10440.225.camel@citrix.com \
--to=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
--cc=jonathan.davies@citrix.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).