From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ding Tianhong Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/3] PCI: Enable PCIe Relaxed Ordering if supported Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2017 11:00:49 +0800 Message-ID: <14218972-553d-eb60-0207-460ac7f4b064@huawei.com> References: <1499955692-26556-1-git-send-email-dingtianhong@huawei.com> <1499955692-26556-3-git-send-email-dingtianhong@huawei.com> <0260e398-bd8e-6615-6d5c-1f7c07b6fc09@huawei.com> <67be791f-e0cf-8284-9229-17174dc741ef@codeaurora.org> <5f9b8bfb-41a8-a17c-6fea-581aec1d5573@huawei.com> <20170724090516.2e0f0d2a@w520.home> <75213fca-4522-2297-3cb8-338e643d3552@huawei.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "mark.rutland@arm.com" , "gabriele.paoloni@huawei.com" , "asit.k.mallick@intel.com" , "catalin.marinas@arm.com" , "will.deacon@arm.com" , "linuxarm@huawei.com" , Sinan Kaya , "ashok.raj@intel.com" , "helgaas@kernel.org" , "jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com" , "linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" , Ganesh GR , "Bob.Shaw@amd.com" , Casey Leedom , "patrick.j.cramer@intel.com" , Alex Williamson , "bhelgaas@google.com" , Michael Werner , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" To: Alexander Duyck Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=m.gmane.org@lists.infradead.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On 2017/7/28 1:49, Alexander Duyck wrote: > On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 6:08 PM, Ding Tianhong wrote: >> >> >> On 2017/7/27 2:26, Casey Leedom wrote: >>> By the way Ding, two issues: >>> >>> 1. Did we ever get any acknowledgement from either Intel or AMD >>> on this patch? I know that we can't ensure that, but it sure would >>> be nice since the PCI Quirks that we're putting in affect their >>> products. >>> >> >> Still no Intel and AMD guys has ack this, this is what I am worried about, should I >> ping some man again ? >> >> Thanks >> Ding > > > I probably wouldn't worry about it too much. If anything all this > patch is doing is disabling relaxed ordering on the platforms we know > have issues based on what Casey originally had. If nothing else we can > follow up once the patches are in the kernel and if somebody has an > issue then. > > You can include my acked-by, but it is mostly related to how this > interacts with NICs, and not so much about the PCI chipsets > themselves. > > Acked-by: Alexander Duyck > Thanks, Alex. :) > . >