From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sebastian Poehn Subject: Re: [PATCH] ip_forward: Drop frames with attached skb->sk Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 08:18:40 +0200 Message-ID: <1428992320.6812.20.camel@googlemail.com> References: <1428990724.6812.8.camel@googlemail.com> <20150413230714.2cf40794@urahara> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Sebastian Poehn , David Miller , netdev@vger.kernel.org, fw@strlen.de, eric.dumazet@gmail.com To: Stephen Hemminger Return-path: Received: from mail-wi0-f177.google.com ([209.85.212.177]:34439 "EHLO mail-wi0-f177.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751105AbbDNGSm (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Apr 2015 02:18:42 -0400 Received: by widjs5 with SMTP id js5so80402010wid.1 for ; Mon, 13 Apr 2015 23:18:41 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20150413230714.2cf40794@urahara> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, 2015-04-13 at 23:07 -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > On Tue, 14 Apr 2015 07:52:04 +0200 > Sebastian Poehn wrote: > > > > > + /* this should happen neither */ > > + if (unlikely(skb->sk)) > > + goto drop; > > + > > With gcc, all goto's are already treated as unlikely(). Thanks for that recommendation. But before I re-cook: What about Clang and ICC?