From: roy.qing.li@gmail.com
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: steffen.klassert@secunet.com, herbert@gondor.apana.org.au
Subject: [PATCH][net-next][v2] xfrm: optimise the use of walk list header in xfrm_policy/state_walk
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 17:09:54 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1429693794-17256-1-git-send-email-roy.qing.li@gmail.com> (raw)
From: Li RongQing <roy.qing.li@gmail.com>
The walk from input is the list header, and marked as dead, and will
be skipped in loop.
list_first_entry() can be used to return the true usable value from
walk if walk is not empty
Signed-off-by: Li RongQing <roy.qing.li@gmail.com>
---
net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c | 4 +++-
net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
index d8c35ad..847053e 100644
--- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
+++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
@@ -1004,7 +1004,9 @@ int xfrm_policy_walk(struct net *net, struct xfrm_policy_walk *walk,
if (list_empty(&walk->walk.all))
x = list_first_entry(&net->xfrm.policy_all, struct xfrm_policy_walk_entry, all);
else
- x = list_entry(&walk->walk.all, struct xfrm_policy_walk_entry, all);
+ x = list_first_entry(&walk->walk.all,
+ struct xfrm_policy_walk_entry, all);
+
list_for_each_entry_from(x, &net->xfrm.policy_all, all) {
if (x->dead)
continue;
diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c
index f5e39e3..df93183 100644
--- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c
+++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c
@@ -1626,7 +1626,7 @@ int xfrm_state_walk(struct net *net, struct xfrm_state_walk *walk,
if (list_empty(&walk->all))
x = list_first_entry(&net->xfrm.state_all, struct xfrm_state_walk, all);
else
- x = list_entry(&walk->all, struct xfrm_state_walk, all);
+ x = list_first_entry(&walk->all, struct xfrm_state_walk, all);
list_for_each_entry_from(x, &net->xfrm.state_all, all) {
if (x->state == XFRM_STATE_DEAD)
continue;
--
2.1.0
next reply other threads:[~2015-04-22 9:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-22 9:09 roy.qing.li [this message]
2015-04-22 9:13 ` [PATCH][net-next][v2] xfrm: optimise the use of walk list header in xfrm_policy/state_walk Herbert Xu
2015-04-27 10:37 ` Steffen Klassert
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1429693794-17256-1-git-send-email-roy.qing.li@gmail.com \
--to=roy.qing.li@gmail.com \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=steffen.klassert@secunet.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).