netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Charles (Chas) Williams" <3chas3@gmail.com>
To: David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM>
Cc: "'Jason A. Donenfeld'" <Jason@zx2c4.com>,
	"shigekatsu.tateno@atmel.com" <shigekatsu.tateno@atmel.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	"oss-security@lists.openwall.com"
	<oss-security@lists.openwall.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] ozwpan: Use proper check to prevent heap overflow
Date: Sat, 16 May 2015 06:20:15 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1431771615.1844.4.camel@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <063D6719AE5E284EB5DD2968C1650D6D1CB36893@AcuExch.aculab.com>

On Fri, 2015-05-15 at 15:02 +0000, David Laight wrote:
> From: Jason A. Donenfeld
> > Sent: 13 May 2015 19:34
> > Since elt->length is a u8, we can make this variable a u8. Then we can
> > do proper bounds checking more easily. Without this, a potentially
> > negative value is passed to the memcpy inside oz_hcd_get_desc_cnf,
> > resulting in a remotely exploitable heap overflow with network
> > supplied data.
> ...
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/ozwpan/ozusbsvc1.c b/drivers/staging/ozwpan/ozusbsvc1.c
> > index d434d8c..cd6c63e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/staging/ozwpan/ozusbsvc1.c
> > +++ b/drivers/staging/ozwpan/ozusbsvc1.c
> > @@ -390,8 +390,10 @@ void oz_usb_rx(struct oz_pd *pd, struct oz_elt *elt)
> >  	case OZ_GET_DESC_RSP: {
> >  			struct oz_get_desc_rsp *body =
> >  				(struct oz_get_desc_rsp *)usb_hdr;
> > -			int data_len = elt->length -
> > +			u8 data_len = elt->length -
> >  					sizeof(struct oz_get_desc_rsp) + 1;
> > +			if (data_len > elt->length)
> > +				break;

This check already seems bogus?  It's really:

	if (sizeof(struct oz_get_desc_rsp) - 1 < 0)

  reply	other threads:[~2015-05-16 10:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-05-13 18:33 [PATCH 0/4] ozwpan: Four remote packet-of-death vulnerabilities Jason A. Donenfeld
2015-05-13 18:33 ` [PATCH 1/4] ozwpan: Use proper check to prevent heap overflow Jason A. Donenfeld
2015-05-15 15:02   ` David Laight
2015-05-16 10:20     ` Charles (Chas) Williams [this message]
2015-05-13 18:33 ` [PATCH 2/4] ozwpan: Use unsigned ints " Jason A. Donenfeld
2015-05-13 18:33 ` [PATCH 3/4] ozwpan: divide-by-zero leading to panic Jason A. Donenfeld
2015-05-13 18:33 ` [PATCH 4/4] ozwpan: unchecked signed subtraction leads to DoS Jason A. Donenfeld
2015-05-13 18:43 ` [oss-security] [PATCH 0/4] ozwpan: Four remote packet-of-death vulnerabilities Greg KH
2015-05-13 18:48   ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2015-05-13 18:53     ` Greg KH

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1431771615.1844.4.camel@gmail.com \
    --to=3chas3@gmail.com \
    --cc=David.Laight@ACULAB.COM \
    --cc=Jason@zx2c4.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=oss-security@lists.openwall.com \
    --cc=shigekatsu.tateno@atmel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).