From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Oliver Neukum Subject: Re: [cdc_ncm] guidance and help refactoring cdc_ncm Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2015 12:49:38 +0200 Message-ID: <1433155778.1884.12.camel@suse.de> References: <20150601005917.GB5320@kroah.com> <1433144906.1557.2.camel@suse.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: youtux@gmail.com, Greg KH , linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Enrico Mioso Return-path: Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:38857 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751322AbbFAKub (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Jun 2015 06:50:31 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, 2015-06-01 at 10:24 +0200, Enrico Mioso wrote: > We are failing on some cases only because of the position we put the > NDP part > of the NCM frame. Infact, this 32-bit driver will work when the 16 bit > one > does, and fail when the 16 bit one does. I think the discussion would benefit from a clearer explanation how those devices need an aggregate to look and how our aggregates look like. Regards Oliver