From: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@odin.com>
To: <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: net: Missed commit aff09ce303f83bd370772349238482ae422a2341 in stable trees
Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2015 18:38:51 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1433864331.23588.117.camel@odin.com> (raw)
Hi,
it looks like the bellow commit is missed in stable kernel versions.
In our local 2.6.32 tree without this commit we observed a bridge
dropping big packets. The fix is in mainstream kernel now.
Please, look if it's need for stable 3.10 kernel etc.
commit aff09ce303f83bd370772349238482ae422a2341
Author: Vasily Averin <vvs@parallels.com>
Date: Mon May 5 00:17:48 2014 +0400
bridge: superfluous skb->nfct check in br_nf_dev_queue_xmit
Currently bridge can silently drop ipv4 fragments.
If node have loaded nf_defrag_ipv4 module but have no nf_conntrack_ipv4,
br_nf_pre_routing defragments incoming ipv4 fragments
but nfct check in br_nf_dev_queue_xmit does not allow re-fragment combined
packet back, and therefore it is dropped in br_dev_queue_push_xmit without
incrementing of any failcounters
It seems the only way to hit the ip_fragment code in the bridge xmit
path is to have a fragment list whose reassembled fragments go over
the mtu. This only happens if nf_defrag is enabled. Thanks to
Florian Westphal for providing feedback to clarify this.
Defragmentation ipv4 is required not only in conntracks but at least in
TPROXY target and socket match, therefore #ifdef is changed from
NF_CONNTRACK_IPV4 to NF_DEFRAG_IPV4
Signed-off-by: Vasily Averin <vvs@openvz.org>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Kirill
reply other threads:[~2015-06-09 15:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1433864331.23588.117.camel@odin.com \
--to=ktkhai@odin.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=w@1wt.eu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).