netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Grumbach, Emmanuel" <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
To: "xerofoify@gmail.com" <xerofoify@gmail.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Spinadel, David" <david.spinadel@intel.com>,
	"ilw@linux.intel.com" <ilw@linux.intel.com>,
	"Coelho, Luciano" <luciano.coelho@intel.com>,
	"eliad@wizery.com" <eliad@wizery.com>,
	"Berg, Johannes" <johannes.berg@intel.com>,
	"kvalo@codeaurora.org" <kvalo@codeaurora.org>,
	"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iwlwifi:dvm:Return false if resume command data is not same size as received packet for the function iwl_resume_status_fn
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 17:10:09 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1433956209.20602.5.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <D665C857-C846-422A-A3D9-A9314B000CD6@gmail.com>

On Wed, 2015-06-10 at 12:58 -0400, Nicholas Krause wrote:
> 
> On June 10, 2015 12:50:45 PM EDT, "Grumbach, Emmanuel" <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com> wrote:
> >On Wed, 2015-06-10 at 12:33 -0400, Nicholas Krause wrote:
> >> This makes the function iwl_resume_status_fn return false now if
> >> the received packet of type iwl_rx_packet is not the same size
> >> as the structure pointer, iwl_resume_data's cmd element in order
> >> to signal callers about this error and allow them to handle it
> >> occurrently.
> >> 
> >
> >Hm... Did you actually hit this if?
> >I am not sure I really want to wait here (which is what will happen if
> >you return false) when we get an unexpected length? I do not expect
> >anything besides the response I am waiting for since the firmware is
> >handling the GET_STATUS *only* - it just came back from WoWLAN. Bottom
> >line, this is really an error path and I prefer to exit and not wait
> >for
> >the timeout in that case.
> >But I might be missing something?
> >
> Why not wait for the time out?  Seems there is no reason not to and in that case
> if the firmware handles this

I doubt it will. This goes back to my original question: did you really
hit this path? Does the patch solves a real bug you faced?

> why is the if statement still here. 

To get a debug print? :)

> Nick 
> >> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Krause <xerofoify@gmail.com>
> >> ---
> >>  drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/dvm/mac80211.c | 2 +-
> >>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >> 
> >> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/dvm/mac80211.c
> >b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/dvm/mac80211.c
> >> index 5abd62e..21e808c 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/dvm/mac80211.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/dvm/mac80211.c
> >> @@ -409,7 +409,7 @@ static bool iwl_resume_status_fn(struct
> >iwl_notif_wait_data *notif_wait,
> >>  
> >>  	if (iwl_rx_packet_payload_len(pkt) != sizeof(*resume_data->cmd)) {
> >>  		IWL_ERR(priv, "rx wrong size data\n");
> >> -		return true;
> >> +		return false;
> >>  	}
> >>  	memcpy(resume_data->cmd, pkt->data, sizeof(*resume_data->cmd));
> >>  	resume_data->valid = true;
> 


      parent reply	other threads:[~2015-06-10 17:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1433954031-7176-1-git-send-email-xerofoify@gmail.com>
     [not found] ` <1433954031-7176-1-git-send-email-xerofoify-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2015-06-10 16:50   ` [PATCH] iwlwifi:dvm:Return false if resume command data is not same size as received packet for the function iwl_resume_status_fn Grumbach, Emmanuel
     [not found]     ` <D665C857-C846-422A-A3D9-A9314B000CD6@gmail.com>
2015-06-10 17:10       ` Grumbach, Emmanuel [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1433956209.20602.5.camel@intel.com \
    --to=emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com \
    --cc=david.spinadel@intel.com \
    --cc=eliad@wizery.com \
    --cc=ilw@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=johannes.berg@intel.com \
    --cc=kvalo@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luciano.coelho@intel.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=xerofoify@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).